new version?
#1
Posted 07 August 2010 - 03:26 AM
I wondered whether Chris would develop AHK more !
Just a Wish: Add more built-in Funcs to AHK
(For example : include some the modules of majkinetor to AHK) :lol:
[Moved from Wish List forum. ~jaco0646]
#2
Posted 07 August 2010 - 04:46 AM
#3
Posted 07 August 2010 - 04:46 AM
Well, that was silly. There have been plenty of developments in the last year, as hugov pointed out. We can't expect Chris to do everything - He has a day job and other real-life priorities.:roll: i've waiting for the new version for nearly a year!
Just a Wish: Add more built-in Funcs to AHK
More built-in functions and other enhancements to function-calling
Source: AutoHotkey Planned Features
Why reinvent the wheel? Time wasted re-writing majkinetor's modules in C++ could be spent in much more important areas. They clearly don't need to be built in, as they're already working in script.(For example : include some the modules of majkinetor to AHK) :lol:
#5
Posted 07 August 2010 - 08:56 PM
Reallllllyyyyy??!!
Come on!
#6
Posted 28 November 2011 - 03:48 AM
(For example : include some the modules of majkinetor to AHK) :lol:
I mean that we should make a included library for AHK users and a ahk help file with those func . so that, users can find what they want faster and easier! it 'll save a lot of time searching the web.Why reinvent the wheel? Time wasted re-writing majkinetor's modules in C++ could be spent in much more important areas. They clearly don't need to be built in, as they're already working in script.
We can make something like this:
- Create a Library BIG topic ( for majkinetor to post his funcs here
- Create a Library Package File Every week (or month) for User to download.
- That all
#7
Posted 28 November 2011 - 06:02 AM
Also nothing, that has been done, kinda. No one has the interest (or time) to maintain it. <!-- m -->http://www.autohotke...pic.php?t=54996<!-- m -->
#8
Posted 28 November 2011 - 10:24 AM
Well, It's a good Tool but it won't be useful because:Also nothing, that has been done, kinda. No one has the interest (or time) to maintain it. <!-- m -->http://www.autohotke...pic.php?t=54996<!-- m -->
- it's not easy to find where it is in AHK forum . I didn't know it's existence
- Update too late ( or never update
So what i wish is a Library Folder like Ask for Help, Scripts & Functions, Announcements ... or at least a Sticky topic
#9
Posted 28 November 2011 - 02:51 PM
The issue, again, is that there are too few forum members dedicated to maintaining a project like this. If you would like to build and maintain something like that, go ahead and give it a shot. If it gets popular enough and turns into a real resource that the community recognizes, it may be added to one of the existing stickies that lists tools and editors and such.
No promises though
#10
Guests
Posted 28 November 2011 - 03:08 PM
See also <!-- m -->http://www.autohotke... ... autohotkey<!-- m -->
(there was/is a subdomain salt.autohotkey.com and even a code repository <!-- m -->http://code.google.com/p/salt/<!-- m --> for that framework)
#12
Posted 28 November 2011 - 05:39 PM
I think only one person can't maintain a library file and that is the main problem because:
- they're personal tools. can all users understand how they work?
- the search machine of AHK 4rum doesn't work well enough to show you all funcs
- AHK forum has a lot of Functions. A person can't collect all,just what he think good for him or someone else!
- a person can't check if function is good enough or unstable.
- if you have a new function and you post on the AHK forum, Will someone see and include it in his Library file ?
-... that's why SALT or Ahk Standard Library Collection can't maintain. ( I've just known their existence :oops: )
and what about the idea:creating a Library Page (or topic or something else like sticky topic) where:
- has a group member (or all AHK users) to check , test, (or vote) funcs . SO that we will know if it is unstable.
- share funcs easily and if that's ok, the next week you can see your funcs in AHK library file.:shock: (update weekly)
- ... it'll be easier for AHK developers to get what the need...
#13
Guests
Posted 28 November 2011 - 07:23 PM
<!-- m -->http://www.autohotke... ... _Libraries<!-- m -->
which can be updated by anybody.
If you actually read the various discussions (there have been quite a few) you'll see it was suggested (by me) to use the wiki as a list and a strip down Tuncays' script to act as "manager". (The wiki would have to be updated and use a certain format to allow for a short description, download link etc)
#14
Posted 28 November 2011 - 08:04 PM
#15
Guests
Posted 28 November 2011 - 08:18 PM




