View topic - ahkstructlib - Functions for use with Structures (version 2) • AutoHotkey Community

View unanswered posts | View active topics

Board index » AutoHotkey » Scripts

All times are UTC [ DST ]

ahkstructlib - Functions for use with Structures (version 2)

Page 4 of 5

[ 70 posts ]

Go to page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Next

Print view | E-mail friend

Previous topic | Next topic

Author

Message

majkinetor

Post subject:

Posted: April 15th, 2007, 10:24 am

Joined: May 24th, 2006, 2:49 pm
Posts: 4511
Location: Belgrade

Quote:

WTF IS THE POINT YOU ARE TRYING TO MAKE!??

LOL, you are funny.

The point is that C# although extremely sophisticatet and abstract language, it is slow as hell due to the level of abstraction. Its normal thing thoguh, increase in abstraction is inversly proportional with performance. And I am not talking about small performance problems. Virutal machines are going to shine in next few years, IMO. So, you can hardly use C# for the job requires performance.

_________________

Top

Lexikos

Post subject:

Posted: April 15th, 2007, 10:53 am

Joined: October 17th, 2006, 4:15 pm
Posts: 7501
Location: Australia

majkinetor wrote:

So, you can hardly use C# for the job requires performance.

That depends highly on the application, as well as the APIs you use. Maybe your C# code is slow as hell, but mine surely isn't.

It's not like it's difficult to write badly performing code in, say, C++.

Top

majkinetor

Post subject:

Posted: April 15th, 2007, 10:55 am

Joined: May 24th, 2006, 2:49 pm
Posts: 4511
Location: Belgrade

_________________

Top

Kulturbanause

Post subject:

Posted: June 10th, 2007, 12:03 pm

Joined: May 19th, 2007, 4:15 pm
Posts: 5

Quote:

ahkstructlib2

ahkstructlib2 is an Include file that I've been working on to hopefully simplify working with structures in AutoHotkey. If anyone has the time to try it out and provide a bit of feedback I'd appreciate it. I'd be interested in hearing any comments, suggestions, bug reports, questions on usage, etc... Smile

** Updated to version 2.01 **
- Version 2.01 is now available with a few changes added since the beta release.
- Version 1 can be downloaded here in case anyone still needs the first version that was posted.

Hi guys i need that libary!!!
Does anybody know where can i download or achieve it? -->ahkstructlib2<--

Thanx in advance

Top

Lexikos*

Post subject:

Posted: June 10th, 2007, 12:35 pm

Kulturbanause wrote:

Hi guys i need that libary!!!
Does anybody know where can i download or achieve it? -->ahkstructlib2<--

It's in the [code] block under "Suggested filename: ahkstructlib2.ahk", near the bottom of the first post of this thread. Just copy-paste it into notepad and save.

Top

Laszlo

Post subject:

Posted: June 10th, 2007, 3:45 pm

Joined: February 14th, 2005, 4:05 pm
Posts: 4710
Location: Boulder, CO

Kulturbanause: You could also consider using the less fancy, much simpler script I put together in 10 minutes. Because the necessary function definitions take only 24 lines, it is easy to adapt to your special needs.

Top

sanitarium

Post subject:

Posted: June 10th, 2007, 6:20 pm

Joined: June 8th, 2007, 8:17 pm
Posts: 28

Laszlo wrote:

...or, Laszlo, you could consider giving a few suggestions to improve the functions that are posted here that have been around a long time instead of suggesting alternatives to people that seem interested...

Last edited by sanitarium on June 10th, 2007, 6:58 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top

sanitarium

Post subject:

Posted: June 10th, 2007, 6:47 pm

Joined: June 8th, 2007, 8:17 pm
Posts: 28

Kulturbanause wrote:

Hi guys i need that libary!!!
Does anybody know where can i download or achieve it? -->ahkstructlib2<--

Thanx in advance

You can either copy it from the first post or download it here. Thanks for reminding me that a download wasn't available.

Top

corrupt

Post subject:

Posted: June 10th, 2007, 6:57 pm

Joined: December 29th, 2004, 1:28 pm
Posts: 2541

- added a download for version 2.01 to the first post [thanks Kulturbanause]

Top

Elevator_Hazard

Post subject:

Posted: June 11th, 2007, 8:47 pm

Joined: October 28th, 2006, 2:14 am
Posts: 297
Location: US

Would you suggest this for a script in which there won't be many structures? I really like the object-orientedish feel of this.

_________________
Changed siggy at request of ahklerner

Top

polyethene

Post subject:

Posted: June 11th, 2007, 8:55 pm

Joined: August 11th, 2004, 1:47 am
Posts: 5346
Location: UK

Elevator_Hazard wrote:

Would you suggest this for a script in which there won't be many structures?

No because it's much slower and you lose the functionality of commands like Sort, SubStr(), parsing loops et al. This isn't real OOP anyway. If you want you can get the beta and experiment with NumGet/Put - I think Anchor v4 is a good example with point structs, window handles etc.)

_________________
GitHub • Scripts • IronAHK • Contact by email not private message.

Top

corrupt

Post subject:

Posted: June 12th, 2007, 12:36 am

Joined: December 29th, 2004, 1:28 pm
Posts: 2541

Elevator_Hazard wrote:

Would you suggest this for a script in which there won't be many structures? I really like the object-orientedish feel of this.

I would suggest it for that purpose as it makes struct usage much more user friendly. On the other hand, I would suggest using one of the less user friendly methods for scripts that heavily rely on repetitive struct access.

Top

corrupt

Post subject:

Posted: June 12th, 2007, 12:44 am

Joined: December 29th, 2004, 1:28 pm
Posts: 2541

Titan wrote:

No because it's much slower

It's not that slow and it depends on what you are scripting. Speed is not always essential in a script vs convenience and readability that can save a lot of time during design.

Titan wrote:

and you lose the functionality of commands like Sort, SubStr(), parsing loops et al.

What functionality is lost? Maybe if you don't know what you're doing...

Titan wrote:

This isn't real OOP anyway.

Nobody said it was and since nobody seems to care about the ability to create objects in AutoHotkey it likely won't happen unless I share a modified version...

Titan wrote:

I think Anchor v4 is a good example with point structs, window handles etc.)

Thanks for the commercial...

Top

corrupt

Post subject:

Posted: June 12th, 2007, 2:13 am

Joined: December 29th, 2004, 1:28 pm
Posts: 2541

In the interest of efficiency and keeping somewhat up to date, these functions, CMDret and a few others will be updated to use the new numspagetti and numnuts functions, callbacks and other current features in the current beta once they are offically released

Top

polyethene

Post subject:

Posted: June 12th, 2007, 8:59 am

Joined: August 11th, 2004, 1:47 am
Posts: 5346
Location: UK

corrupt wrote:

It's not that slow and it depends on what you are scripting.

It is much slower and more complex than simple variable assignments.

corrupt wrote:

What functionality is lost?

Pseudo array functions like Sort, Parsing loops, StringSplit and enumerations for example.

corrupt wrote:

nobody seems to care about the ability to create objects

Elevator_Hazard said "I really like the object-orientedish feel of this." which I was responding to.

corrupt wrote:

Thanks for the commercial...

Education != Commercial ffs...

corrupt wrote:

CMDret and a few others will be updated to use the new numspagetti and numnuts functions, callbacks and other...

Great, they'll be useful examples to learn from.

_________________
GitHub • Scripts • IronAHK • Contact by email not private message.

Top

Page 4 of 5

[ 70 posts ]

Go to page Previous 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 Next

Board index » AutoHotkey » Scripts

All times are UTC [ DST ]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests

You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum