AutoHotkey Community

It is currently May 27th, 2012, 12:05 am

All times are UTC [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 31 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

Should Microsoft be allowed to put whatever they want into their OS?
Yesh!
Nesh!
Meh...
You may select 1 option

View results
Author Message
PostPosted: January 27th, 2009, 10:51 pm 
Offline

Joined: January 12th, 2008, 7:45 pm
Posts: 131
Hey!

Just read that EU might force Microsoft to include various web browsers to their future versions of Windows. This has happened once before, but that was regarding Windows Media Player... This is something that really bugs me.

Why the hell are MS forced to listen to this "bs" (Sorry can't think of a proper word atm...). Isn't it their right to include what the hell they want to their OS? I don't agree with opera, Windows is already bloated as it is, I don't think they should add additional crap just cause someone else got ** real bad... Ofc. the optional webbrowsers are kewl, I use Firefox and Google Chrome (some modifications I've made utilizing AHK). But still, I'd rather fetch the latest versions myself than having a bloated OS, besides they should be allowed to put w/e they want to their OS.

let's say I made a app that utilizes a dll from winamp, and suddenly EU forced me to apply support for iTunes/WMP/foobar or w/e, that would ** me off, it's my application why the hell am I forced to listen to someone else about the content in my app? Would you like it if someone forced you to implement other ** into your precious app?

[Link to article]

Wrote this on the fly, my arguments may not make any sense...

_________________
Image


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: January 28th, 2009, 12:18 am 
I think the issue here is that MS interweaves IE so deep into the OS (like it does with Media Player), that it is near impossible to remove it (just try it), which is the reason that the EU sued them over it.

MS could just program IE to be a seperate program, than they wouldn't have this "problem".

And finally: this is essentially about search-engine revenue. MS wants users to use Live Search, Opera/FF/Chrome benefit from revenue they get from Google, and since most computer users are too ignorant to know there even exists different browsers, all of those companies ofcourse want their browser to be the default.


Report this post
Top
  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: January 28th, 2009, 1:29 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: November 2nd, 2008, 4:23 pm
Posts: 2906
Location: 127.0.0.1
Quote:
MS could just program IE to be a seperate program, than they wouldn't have this "problem".
I believe they do this so you cant uninstal IE explorer and have no way to download it. They could have a program that tells you when you start it up if you have 0 internet browsers and a choice to download one.

_________________
aboutscriptappsscripts
Any code ⇈ above ⇈ requires AutoHotkey_L to run


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: January 28th, 2009, 9:45 am 
Offline

Joined: February 28th, 2008, 8:02 pm
Posts: 100
Location: Krk, PL
n-l-i-d wrote:
I think the issue here is that MS interweaves IE so deep into the OS (like it does with Media Player), that it is near impossible to remove it (just try it), which is the reason that the EU sued them over it.

So? What's the problem with inability to uninstall IE? They want to be green and prevent people from wasting 20 MB?

_________________
Benjamin Franklin wrote:
Anyone who trades liberty for security deserves neither liberty nor security.


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: January 28th, 2009, 10:40 am 
Offline

Joined: April 19th, 2005, 10:26 am
Posts: 2249
Location: switzerland
Since I have a windows computer (XP, works fine) I used mosttime
Mozilla, notespad, ahk, Irfanview, OpenOffice, different search engines and VLC (instead of WindowsMediaPlayer)
(and many other small standalone commandline freeware combined with ahk)
MS should separate their programs


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: January 28th, 2009, 4:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: August 2nd, 2008, 12:31 am
Posts: 101
It's nice that they save memory, but that's where the good things stop.
I find most of their apps are outclassed by others. And they tend to be behind in most things. I think MS should stick to writing the OS, and leave the other programs to other people, for example Mozilla's done a fine job with Firefox.

_________________
Woot.

Please read forum etiquette


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: January 28th, 2009, 5:12 pm 
Offline

Joined: November 2nd, 2004, 2:43 pm
Posts: 1019
Location: London, UK
if the system does not come with a web browser then how would you download an alternative?????

_________________
Steve F AKA Superfraggle

http://r.yuwie.com/superfraggle


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: January 28th, 2009, 5:15 pm 
Offline

Joined: February 28th, 2008, 8:02 pm
Posts: 100
Location: Krk, PL
Superfraggle wrote:
if the system does not come with a web browser then how would you download an alternative?????

Good point! :lol:

_________________
Benjamin Franklin wrote:
Anyone who trades liberty for security deserves neither liberty nor security.


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: January 28th, 2009, 5:41 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: December 21st, 2007, 3:14 pm
Posts: 3826
Location: Louisville KY USA
first of all telling microsoft what they can and can put in there own operating sytem is a bit like telling mercedes to use only pink steering wheels
its ludacris
hard drives today start at 40 gb so space it takes for the os is also a ludacris objection
what chaps my can is how often folks want to attack a retailer for not selling a product that is free. Fire fox opera etc
Ever look at the license. for these products
Microsoft could no more sell there OS with these products.
And why shouldnt Microsoft use there own software as the default
how mad would i be if fedora som how became required to include IE
seriously its no different
Folks need to calm down and realise. companies have a right to put any product they own in any product they sell. and consumers have a right not to buy them
if you dont want IE buy a MAC or even yet by your next pc with linux

_________________
No matter what your oppinion Please join this discussion
Formal request to Polyethene
Image


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: January 28th, 2009, 7:16 pm 
Offline

Joined: November 2nd, 2004, 2:43 pm
Posts: 1019
Location: London, UK
Not only that but how many programs do you know that use the IE control in their applications to allow basic web functionality. If this was removed then applications would either need to launch your default browser or create their own web control.

It would increase the size of other apps. Also if IE wasn't tied in then M$ would have no need to create all the extra http calls that are also used by other apps.

I honestly agree that it makes pefect sense for IE to be in there and tied into the operating system the way it is. Anyway its not as if M$ try and prevent you from using alternatves.

_________________
Steve F AKA Superfraggle

http://r.yuwie.com/superfraggle


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: October 8th, 2009, 3:51 am 
Offline

Joined: November 30th, 2008, 7:37 pm
Posts: 22
Superfraggle wrote:
Anyway its not as if M$ try and prevent you from using alternatves.


Yet...


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: October 9th, 2009, 12:54 am 
Offline

Joined: June 10th, 2009, 6:34 pm
Posts: 102
As someone who has tried to run their computer without Internet Explorer, I can definitely say that the way they integrate it with their operating system and support sites make the Windows operating system and Internet Explorer anti-competitive. What the courts should have done was tried them under competition law (a.k.a. antitrust law) and forced them to remove the critical dependencies the Microsoft operating system has on Internet Explorer or else face fines and maybe even ban the selling of the operating system.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tying_%28commerce%29


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: October 9th, 2009, 9:39 am 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: August 30th, 2005, 8:43 pm
Posts: 8666
Location: Salem, MA
that would break most of the functionality in windows. IE is part of the engine of windows, and how it works.

People need to understand the IE /is/ the operating system (interface), and it happens to be able to browse webpages too.


should all linux distros be required to ship without a browser installed? they almost all force you to have Firefox, or some crap that is custom for the distro.

Shouls Apple be forced to remove Safari from Mac OS?

OSs come with internet browsers. That's because they need to.

_________________
Image
(Common Answers) - New Tutorials Forum - Humongous FAQ


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: October 9th, 2009, 4:37 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: March 19th, 2008, 12:43 am
Posts: 5480
Location: the tunnel(?=light)
lrh9 wrote:
I can definitely say that the way they integrate it with their operating system and support sites make the Windows operating system and Internet Explorer anti-competitive.


Isn't that a bit like saying McDonald's selling their own french fries with a value meal makes them anti-competitive?

_________________
Image
Try Quick Search for Autohotkey or see the tutorial for newbies.


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
 Post subject:
PostPosted: October 9th, 2009, 10:04 pm 
Offline
User avatar

Joined: December 21st, 2007, 3:14 pm
Posts: 3826
Location: Louisville KY USA
its entirely possible since you dislike microsoft so much that you should persue another OS as always the consumer drives the market more than the laws

_________________
No matter what your oppinion Please join this discussion
Formal request to Polyethene
Image


Report this post
Top
 Profile  
Reply with quote  
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 31 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Ragnar and 8 guests


You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group