AutoHotkey Community

Last time I checked the fact that we used a nuke on the Japanese ended the war. No one stepped up after that.

_________________
COM Tutorial for Webpages
COM Tutorial for Excel

Any evidence or a link to a source that supports that? Are you suggesting that if the Allies had not fought back Germany would have ended the war sooner? Perhaps if the Allies had surrendered, but otherwise that's ridiculous.

Early on many Germans supported the war for a variety of reasons, not the least of which was they were lied to by their government and believed they were defending themselves from Poland and their French and English allies who declared war on Germany. http://www.lewrockwell.com/hornberger/h ... er132.html However when it it was clear Germany had no chance of success - in large part due to the destruction of military manufacturing facilities, the cut-off of foreign trade and supplies, and the high price the nation was paying at home - several of Hitlers generals tried to assassinate him so they could end the war sooner. The bombings were *highly* successful in demoralizing Germany, it's military and shortening the war.


Which is exactly why some people fight back by throwing the criminals who attack them in jail.... it's quite natural and the criminals should expect it

Whoa whoa. We're talking about history, not philosophy now. This means that there is a "right answer."

When the U.S. dropped two atomic bombs on Japan, they surrendered. The war ended. It did not make the Japanese stronger or more supportive of their goverment. In fact, the Japanese emporer admitted that he was mortal. One more time: the war >ended< shortly after the second A-bomb.

_________________
Autofire, AutoClick, Toggle, Spam • Window Control Tools
Recommended: AutoHotkey_L

It would be a wrong to insinuate that Japan surrendered solely because of the A-Bombs, however...

I suppose it is true. The strongest statement I will make is that the bombings greatly influenced Japan's decision to surrender. There is in fact quite the debate over the bombings' influences.

Violent rape has a lot more to do with power and subjugation than sex. Most sex crimes are lesser than that though. And I think it's not a good example to compare America to a third world country like Thailand, where you basically have two options for employment, farming and sex. Also their government officials are wholly corrupt *and not in the way that like, a congressman backs interests that support his reelection campaign and his party, which is just the result of a shitty system that needs updated*, but more in the way of police officials will stop wealthy looking people and foreigners randomly for stupid things to get bribes.

Japan didn't surrender, and it wasn't a war.

TROLOLOL WUT?

_________________
Autofire, AutoClick, Toggle, Spam • Window Control Tools
Recommended: AutoHotkey_L

country simply refers to people of that nation and yes they can be compared. good persons can be born anywhere. Crime has nothing to do with country and it totally depends on ethics of individual. terrorists don't belong to any country or religion

What time is your bedtime, please?

When you say most sex crimes are lesser, to which are you referring that aren't related to prostitution? What non-prostitution-related sex crimes do you speculate would be lessened if prostitution were legal? I don't mean that in a confrontational sort of way - I really can't think of any.

The internet seems divided: http://prostitution.procon.org/view.ans ... nID=000122







The EU is finding that human trafficking and forced prostitution is increased in countries like Germany and Britain where prostitution is legal. http://www.humantrafficking.org/updates/773

People cannot be rehabilitated certain individuals can be convinced to suppress their natural tendencies in a sense of personal economy. they trade what they want in return for giving up their urges. Most cannot control themselves. the prison system in the united states is not designed to rehabilitate but to confine for profit. If it were designed for rehabilitation there would not be sentences but defined stages to freedom that each convice must pass to freedom without regard to any predefined term. in almost all cases those in prison presented with the same circumstances would comit the exact acts that landed them in prison.

_________________
No matter what your oppinion Please join this discussion
Formal request to Polyethene

@tank
I find your idea of a tiered achievement rehabilitation system intriguing. It sounds similar to a 12 step program of sorts.

I am at least skeptical of this. I have known several people who were 'guests' of the prison system, and there are a LOT of pathetic and terrified people locked up here in the U.S. While I agree that human nature does not change, I also know that behavior is influenced by experience. There are a great many prisoners who got into trouble not because they were malicious, but because they were stupid. And many of these would do just about anything to avoid getting entangled in the legal system again.

_________________
"My dear Mr Gyrth, I am never more serious than when I am joking."
~Albert Campion
My personal site

except you cant fix stupid

_________________
No matter what your oppinion Please join this discussion
Formal request to Polyethene

I concede the point.

_________________
"My dear Mr Gyrth, I am never more serious than when I am joking."
~Albert Campion
My personal site