Hej, Bobo
that really isn't very important how the program got its name, nor is it clone or not. How good it is counts only.
Yes they are all clones of NC for DOS, but then, Norton has cool idea witch he didn't developed very well, thats why nobody used NC for Windows many years latter. Even in DOS times, Dos Navigator was uncountable times better file manager (made by "The Bat" guys)
Total (formerly Windows, not Win) Commander is the best succider to Dos Navigator. Other navigators were ither unsuccesfull or made for specific purpose, like Volcov Commander witch is extraordinary small utility and was made to be able to run it from floppy disk and still have almost hole diskette available for usage. Then it also supports Long File Names (LFN) in DOS, with SysInternals DOS LFN driver.
Anyway, it is ofcourse personal thing, but I don't think that Exploer can be counted as serious file manager no more then IE6 can be used as serious browser nor Notepad as serious editor etc... Those are default things, made for people who doesn't need anything but basic functionality.
Anyway, Bobo, you usualy don't have enough arguments for your claims, witch is obvious since you usualy soon switch to some form of funny conversation, like the one above. I find that malitious, covered by some form of nice behavior. I guess you are well informed on Shopenhauers Eristic Dialectic work, cuz you use the tricks mentioned in that manual extensively...
