AutoHotkey Community

Contains++

_________________
AHK_H (2alpha) AHF TT _Struct WatchDir Yaml _Input ObjTree RapidHotkey DynaRun

Good question, what happens when you increment a function?



Hmm doesn't do much, just calls the function...

_________________
Scripts - License

great obfuscation technique too

_________________
Autofire, AutoClick, Toggle, Spam • Window Control Tools
Recommended: AutoHotkey_L

That's a bug. The correct behaviour is to assign and return an empty string. Instead, it skips the assignment and returns an empty string. obj.fn := obj.fn + 1 and obj.fn += 1 should produce the correct result.

Oh, uh well I totally meant to point out that bug...

In any case, what do you guys think of Max() and Min() ?

I've been thinking, I would actually prefer to have two additional built-in object functions: ObjMax() & ObjMin().

This would allow the greatest flexibility.

• Use it on an existing object: myobject.max()
• Create an object just to find the max value: ObjMax([1,12,123,1234])

If some crazy person (me) wants something that returns the min/max of args, a simple variadic function wrapper would work great:

_________________
Scripts - License

I thought also about this. Even already implemented Methods seem to be inconsistent;

This goes in the same direction of "obj.IndexOf(value)"

All in all, obj.contains(), obj.count() are very important, but actually just for lists and not required in the base Object.

Wouldnt it be a better idea, to provide a second Object called List/Collection, which provides that functionality? Is this possible with the current prototype implementation?



If this is not an option, we could at least provide a standard lib with classes for Collection, Delegate etc, which are shipped with AHK_L.

_________________
http://securityvision.ch
AHK 2D GAME ENGINE