AutoHotkey Homepage AutoHotkey Community
Let's help each other out
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Should the downloaded installer omit the version number?
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
 
Reply to topic    AutoHotkey Community Forum Index -> Announcements
View previous topic :: View next topic  

What should be the installer's filename?
Keep it as it is now, e.g. AutoHotkey102506.exe
48%
 48%  [ 41 ]
Omit the version number, e.g. AutoHotkeyInstall.exe
51%
 51%  [ 43 ]
Total Votes : 84

Author Message
corrupt



Joined: 29 Dec 2004
Posts: 2485

PostPosted: Sun Mar 09, 2008 1:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Unless storage space is a consideration, I'd support both... It just means keeping a couple duplicates on the server but allows people to always link to the latest version or to a specific version...
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Tuncay



Joined: 07 Nov 2006
Posts: 1886
Location: Germany

PostPosted: Sun Mar 09, 2008 6:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Version numbered software downloads sucks, if they are updated recently.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
Justin D'nikotime



Joined: 17 Jun 2008
Posts: 1

PostPosted: Tue Jun 17, 2008 8:49 pm    Post subject: Should the downloaded installer omit the version number? Reply with quote

Chris wrote:

... it makes the filename a little longer, which hurts its score a little.


May I suggest "AHKInstall_1.0.42.03.exe" and "AHKInstall_1.0.42.03.Zip"
Both are small, clearly state the version#, anyone who is on www.autohotkey.com had better know what the AHK in the filename means.

PhiLho wrote:

I believe external sites shouldn't provide a link directly to the exe.
Two reasons:
1) I am always reluctant to use such link, even more in days of phising and similar trojan tricks...
2) It is similar to bandwidth stealing, althought this term applies more to displaying an image hosted by an external site without consent of the targetted server.
If even Chris wants to display ads on his site (why not?), such links means he would miss ad impressions.
And in all cases, I prefer to get informations from the source.

Similarly, I am even more reluctant to get a file stored on an external site, since it is likely to be outdated. Exception: when the original site disapeared...


I agree, if an external site wants to point to AHK, the link should be to chris's download page, not the exe.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jackieku



Joined: 30 Nov 2008
Posts: 73

PostPosted: Tue May 05, 2009 4:41 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think you may provide both by using symbolic links or http redirections?

Like...

AutoHotkey_1.0.48.00.zip
AutoHotkey_latest.zip -> AutoHotkey_1.0.48.00.zip
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Lexikos



Joined: 17 Oct 2006
Posts: 7299
Location: Australia

PostPosted: Tue May 05, 2009 9:33 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think your post is a little (or a lot) late. For instance,
http://www.autohotkey.com/download/AutoHotkey.zip
...currently appears to link to "AutoHotkey104803.zip".
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    AutoHotkey Community Forum Index -> Announcements All times are GMT
Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3
Page 3 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group