| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Kijuto Riddle
Joined: 15 Jan 2005 Posts: 9
|
Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2005 4:11 am Post subject: Windows Taskbar still flashing |
|
|
Hi Chris! I don't know why but my script still flashes the Windows Taskbar Menu.
I'm using Win2K3 Server. I closed all other Autohotkey programs, run this script,
hold the Left Win key, double-click (single-click works fine)...
My Taskbar set to autohide mode (although I think it not significant).
| Code: |
#SingleInstance force
#InstallKeybdHook force
#LButton::
Send {End}
return
|
_________________ I'll pick my own name, and my own life.
So I can live my own life in my own way.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chris Site Admin
Joined: 02 Mar 2004 Posts: 10467
|
Posted: Thu Jan 27, 2005 5:01 am Post subject: |
|
|
This appears to be caused by the fact that the only way to stop a key from auto-repeating while you're holding it down is to physically press another key on the keyboard. Since mouse buttons do not qualify as keys for this purpose, the key (probably LWin) continues to auto-repeat, sending down-events until you release it.
The combination of the above with the fact that your Win+LButton hotkey uses the Send command is what causes the Start Menu to appear sometimes.
Although I don't see any way to fix this directly, one of these might be a workaround:
1) Use #^LButton instead of #LButton. For this to work, you have to press Ctrl after holding down LWin.
2) Get in the habit of not holding down LWin a long time while clicking.
3) Disable LWin's normal function by means of "LWin::return" and change your hotkey to be "LWin & LButton".
I know none of the above might be particularly desirable. I will keep a lookout for a better solution.
By the way, it would be helpful if you post follow-ups to a previous bug report by replying to it rather than starting a new topic. In this case, the previous topic is http://www.autohotkey.com/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1878
Thanks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kijuto Riddle
Joined: 15 Jan 2005 Posts: 9
|
Posted: Sat Jan 29, 2005 4:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sorry about the new topic! Anyway, I still believe the older release (1.0.2.4-) works fine with my script above.
I used that script all the times, and from the 1.0.2.5, I have to change it. Unfortunately, I removed my Autohotkey1024.exe, and I can't get it back to prove it. _________________ I'll pick my own name, and my own life.
So I can live my own life in my own way.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chris Site Admin
Joined: 02 Mar 2004 Posts: 10467
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kijuto Riddle
Joined: 15 Jan 2005 Posts: 9
|
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2005 7:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
Sory for wasting your time. I've tried the 1.0.2.4 version, It still flash the Menu but less frequency. Yes, it's true. With 1.0.2.5+, only with a single double-click, the Start Menu pops up. And with 1.0.2.4-, double-click works fine, but if I click continuously, that problem will occur, maybe once per 10 clicks. _________________ I'll pick my own name, and my own life.
So I can live my own life in my own way.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chris Site Admin
Joined: 02 Mar 2004 Posts: 10467
|
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2005 2:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Thanks for the follow-up. If you can't find an acceptable workaround, I'm thinking of adding a "SendBlind" command that might provide a way to fix issues like this one. Let me know if you need it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kijuto Riddle
Joined: 15 Jan 2005 Posts: 9
|
Posted: Tue Feb 01, 2005 3:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yep! But maybe No, add more commands which not everyone want is not a good idea. Althought I really need it, but I've just found the alternative way to solve it, and maybe it helpful for everyone. If you can add a command to jump to the last tab-element of a tab-control, then SendBlind is no need (for me).
I think the Control command lacks of some tab-control sub command:
+ get the number of tab-elements
+ jump to the specified tab-element _________________ I'll pick my own name, and my own life.
So I can live my own life in my own way.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chris Site Admin
Joined: 02 Mar 2004 Posts: 10467
|
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 2:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks. I was thinking of adding SendBlind for other reasons, so it will probably get done eventually anyway.
| Quote: | I think the Control command lacks of some tab-control sub command:
+ get the number of tab-elements
+ jump to the specified tab-element | Good idea. Here is a workaround until it's added:
SendMessage, 0x1304,,, SysTabControl321, WinTitle ; 0x1304 is TCM_GETITEMCOUNT.
TabCount = %ErrorLevel%
To instead select a tab directly by number, replace the number 5 below with one less than the tab number you wish to select. In other words, 0 selects the first tab, 1 selects the second, etc.
SendMessage, 0x130C, 5,, SysTabControl321, WinTitle ; 0x130C is TCM_SETCURSEL. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kijuto Riddle
Joined: 15 Jan 2005 Posts: 9
|
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 3:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
That's great! Thanks! And two more question:
1) The Send/PostMessage are faster than other commands because they directly talks with the target window, aren't they?
2) Why did AutoHotkey release many minor versions recently. _________________ I'll pick my own name, and my own life.
So I can live my own life in my own way.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jonny
Joined: 13 Nov 2004 Posts: 3004 Location: Minnesota
|
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 3:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | 1) The Send/PostMessage are faster than other commands because they directly talks with the target window, aren't they? |
Most commands do, really; it's just that the internal workings of PostMessage are a lot easier to see. You can ask Chris if you want to know the specific functions which each command uses, but I think if PostMessage methods were faster and more efficient, he would use them. Just something to think about.
| Quote: | | 2) Why did AutoHotkey release many minor versions recently. |
It only seems that way. In reality, such small changes have always happened, but until recently they were transparent unless you regularly checked up on the Announcements sub-forum. Chris added the extra resolution to the version number to help those of us who use a script to automatically update AutoHotkey. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ranomore
Joined: 06 Nov 2004 Posts: 178 Location: Salt Lake City, UT
|
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 3:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
2) Since Chris was actually releasing minor version updates between major ones anyway, I would guess he just made it easier to keep track of by numbering them in addition to posting a pre-next version announcement in the forum.
Plus some of us were begging him for the ability to automatically update every time a change was applied to the installer, and it's really a lot easier to do with minor version numbers! Thanks Chris! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
ranomore
Joined: 06 Nov 2004 Posts: 178 Location: Salt Lake City, UT
|
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 3:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Argh! Mr. Jonny Cool Guy beat me!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chris Site Admin
Joined: 02 Mar 2004 Posts: 10467
|
Posted: Wed Feb 02, 2005 3:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Kijuto Riddle wrote: | | The Send/PostMessage are faster than other commands because they directly talks with the target window, aren't they? | Many of the Control commands use Send/PostMessage internally. However, due to SetControlDelay, Send/PostMessage might appear to be faster since it is not subject to the delay. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Kijuto Riddle
Joined: 15 Jan 2005 Posts: 9
|
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2005 9:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
To sum up:
Post/SendMessage: faster and more powerful (independent with Chris's works).
Other Commands: (maybe) slower but esier to read. _________________ I'll pick my own name, and my own life.
So I can live my own life in my own way.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jonny
Joined: 13 Nov 2004 Posts: 3004 Location: Minnesota
|
Posted: Thu Feb 03, 2005 3:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Even if they are slower, the difference is infinitesimal enough to justify better readability and easier coding. "WinMinimize,A" is easier to read and remember than "PostMessage,0x112,0xf020,,,A". And like Chris has already said, some of them use it internally too, so the only delay is the one set by the user. (Try SetControlDelay, -1) |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|