| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| What do you think about this wsh |
| Cmon Chris, add this FFS ! |
|
80% |
[ 12 ] |
| No Chris, don't listen to them ! |
|
20% |
[ 3 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 15 |
|
| Author |
Message |
majkinetor
Joined: 24 May 2006 Posts: 3592 Location: Belgrade
|
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 9:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Not that big - 16,350.
| Quote: | | I voted yes, but, er.. was the poll here before or was just introduced ? |
Obviously not
BTW, I acctually can't imagine why would somebody vote negative here....  _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
SKAN
Joined: 26 Dec 2005 Posts: 5574
|
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 10:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| majkinetor wrote: | BTW, I acctually can't imagine why would somebody vote negative here....  |
Just trying to be imaginative... I pray god it was not Mr.Chris
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
majkinetor
Joined: 24 May 2006 Posts: 3592 Location: Belgrade
|
Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2007 11:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
OH Lets pray together.....
| Quote: | | Just trying to be imaginative |
Damn, this hurts... _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lexikos
Joined: 17 Oct 2006 Posts: 2472 Location: Australia, Qld
|
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 1:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
| majkinetor wrote: | | Not that big - 16,350. | Not even that big. The buffer AutoHotkey uses is 65534 bytes. It's based on the limit of an Edit control on Win9x.
I did a simple test, creating 17000 empty variables named v%A_Index%. It hit the buffer limit at 3465 variables. That would be even less if the variables weren't empty... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
majkinetor
Joined: 24 May 2006 Posts: 3592 Location: Belgrade
|
Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 1:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
OMG!!!! That is so not good... so we can get in normal scenarios mostly 2K variables.... _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
corrupt
Joined: 29 Dec 2004 Posts: 2381
|
Posted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 9:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
override the limit... and/or use richedit internally instead  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|