| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
user
Joined: 05 Oct 2006
Posts: 423
|
 Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 9:29 am Post subject: Automise vs Autohotkey |
 |
|
hello
anyone tested www.automise.com? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
BoBo¨
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 9:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Code: | Product/1 Named User/1 Concurrent User/Enterprise Licensing
Automise 2 : $195 $495 POA
Automise 2 with 1 year Software Assurance : $234 $594 POA
Automise 2 Lite : $49 n/a n/a
Automise 2 Lite with 1 year Software Assurance : $59 n/a n/a |
Kinda advertising, right!!  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
neXt
Joined: 19 Mar 2007
Posts: 367
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 3:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
since you asked, AHK is free and can do pretty much anything, therefore AHK
is better. You picked a wrong spot to market your product. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest10
Guest
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 4:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| neXt wrote: | | You picked a wrong spot to market your product. |
Marketing after 422 posts? The bloke asked a simple question  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
neXt
Joined: 19 Mar 2007
Posts: 367
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 10, 2008 11:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | Marketing after 422 posts? |
So? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Guest10
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 8:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
| neXt wrote: | | Quote: | | Marketing after 422 posts? |
So? |
If you can't figure that out by yourself, no one can help you there I guess, get over it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
user
Joined: 05 Oct 2006
Posts: 423
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 8:11 am Post subject: |
|
|
| neXt wrote: | since you asked, AHK is free and can do pretty much anything, therefore AHK
is better. You picked a wrong spot to market your product. |
you are stupid idiot shit
and that Bobo shit above too
I wouldn't waste any time answering those idiots that think this is spam, neither I would apologize to shits
but for novices, there are other threads comparing Ranorex and other commercials with AHK
this program is just mentioned in wikipedia in automation programs and I wondered if someone tried it
now idiots can f*** off |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
haichen
Joined: 05 Feb 2007
Posts: 97
Location: Osnabrück, Germany
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 9:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | There are other threads comparing Ranorex and other commercials with AHK.
This program is just mentioned in wikipedia in automation programs and I wondered if someone tried it |
That was the core of your answer. The rest was needless.
Please don't answer. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
calm down
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 10:36 am Post subject: |
|
|
by viewing this feature list:
| Quote: | Features Automise Lite Automise
IDE Features
Easy to use and powerful GUI
Hierarchial logging to database
Debugging (Watches, Breakpoints, etc)
Integrated ActiveScript
Run projects in IDE or on command line
ActionStudio
Run multiple actions in parallel
Set and change project edit password
Action Studio Features
Develop actions in .NET, VBScript, JScript
Property Page designer
Script editor
Integrated help
Actions
Actions operating on Variables
Archiver actions
CD/DVD burner actions
Files & Directory actions
GUI Automation Actions
Interactive actions
Internet actions
Iterator actions
Miscellaneous actions
PsTools actions
String and Path Manipulation actions
Windows Adminstration actions
XML actions
Database actions
Flow control actions
PDF & Image manipulation actions
Registry and INI actions
Windows Installer & MSI actions
Windows OS actions
.NET Tool actions
Active Directory actions
IIS Actions
Microsoft Message Queuing (MSMQ) actions
NTFS Junction points actions
System Restore points
Stack & Queue actions
Virtualization Software actions
Partially included in this edition (click the category for details.)
Fully included in this edition |
i wold say:
there is probably nothing you can`t do with ahk, too,
but some things might be easier with automise, especially when you have no experience with coding. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ich
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 3:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| haichen wrote: |
That was the core of your answer. The rest was needless.
Please don't answer. |
Typisch deutsch, blöde Aussage |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
neXt
Joined: 19 Mar 2007
Posts: 367
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 4:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | you are stupid idiot shit
and that Bobo shit above too
I wouldn't waste any time answering those idiots that think this is spam, neither I would apologize to shits
but for novices, there are other threads comparing Ranorex and other commercials with AHK
this program is just mentioned in wikipedia in automation programs and I wondered if someone tried it
now idiots can f*** off |
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ShitBoBo
Guest
|
| Posted: Fri Apr 11, 2008 11:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | and that Bobo shit above too
I wouldn't waste any time answering those idiots that think this is spam, neither I would apologize to shits
but for novices, there are other threads comparing Ranorex and other commercials with AHK
this program is just mentioned in wikipedia in automation programs and I wondered if someone tried it
now idiots can f*** off |
Well, I guess I was wrong with my assumption that an idiot wanted to do some marketing for an application. 
Well, looks like he's doing some marketing for himself now. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
neXt
Joined: 19 Mar 2007
Posts: 367
|
| Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 12:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
Bobo, indeed
Guest10, i think you are the one is not getting it. FYI if someone is trying to market a product it doesn't mean that they have to be a 1 post spammer to do that. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Buzcatcher
Joined: 06 Mar 2008
Posts: 5
|
| Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 8:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So, from your attitude guys, I guess that anybody asking for some comparison between AHK and any non-open source, paid automation product would be deemed as a marketing spammer, right ? No chance at all about some genuine curiosity ?
Since when is it heretical to open such thread for comparison sakes ?!?
I guess that I must be an idiot, too, since I really don't get it, then.
buy.
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Oberon
Joined: 18 Feb 2008
Posts: 408
|
| Posted: Sat Apr 12, 2008 10:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Similar story when news of Prism came about...
| Mozilla Prism and the disingenuous web wrote: | | So, I guess the thing I found odd was Mozilla appears to be building something very similar to Adobe AIR (which is fine and cool), but somehow it is inherently good when Mozilla [open source] does it, and inherently evil when Adobe [proprietary] does it. |
At the end of the day, businesses exist to make money, which when all said and done is the basic description of it all. The public sector such as governments, schools, education centres, and individuals would be more interested in open source developments as it's readily available at no cost or technological barrier, and they can be sure that the developers' hold their consumers best interests at the very top of their agenda. The debate over proprietary vs. free software is one that has been going on for decades. While both have their strengths and weaknesses, open source advocates (ahk users) don't take kindly to commercial competition. The converse is even more true. Therefore I think BoBo was right to point out how ignorant user was.
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
