| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Drugwash
Joined: 07 Sep 2008 Posts: 921 Location: Ploiesti, RO
|
Posted: Thu Nov 27, 2008 5:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Thank you so much for your continuous work on AHK, Chris!
I'm too old to believe in Santa, however I got a couple wishes that hopefully would come true:
1. Keep AHK compatible with Win9x (I'll be using Win98SE or nothing at all)
2. Allow for scripts with spaces in their names to be launched (currently there's an error stating 'script does not exist')
So far my scripts run correctly with the new beta. Keep up the good work and good luck with all of your projects! _________________ AHK tools by Drugwash |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Krogdor
Joined: 18 Apr 2008 Posts: 1390 Location: The Interwebs
|
Posted: Thu Nov 27, 2008 6:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Drugwash wrote: | | 2. Allow for scripts with spaces in their names to be launched (currently there's an error stating 'script does not exist') |
I have never had such a problem... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
IsNull
Joined: 10 May 2007 Posts: 593 Location: .switzerland
|
Posted: Thu Nov 27, 2008 6:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Krogdor wrote: | | Drugwash wrote: | | 2. Allow for scripts with spaces in their names to be launched (currently there's an error stating 'script does not exist') |
I have never had such a problem... | might be an issue from win 98... xp + vista don't care spaces in the name... _________________ http://securityvision.ch
AHK 2D GAME ENGINE |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Drugwash
Joined: 07 Sep 2008 Posts: 921 Location: Ploiesti, RO
|
Posted: Thu Nov 27, 2008 7:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
I have been given a helping hand in the mean time (thank you, corrupt!).
Since I had not installed AHK using the installer but only manually associated the .ahk files with the exe, the commandline for file opening missed the parameters.
Explorer > Tools > Folder Options > File Types (tab) --> AHK file --> Edit --> Actions > open > Edit. The field called "Application used to perform action:" should be "C:\Utils\AutoHotkey 1.0.47.06\AutoHotkey.exe" "%1" %* (path to the exe will vary according to AHK's location).
Thanks corrupt for the help and apologies for the inconvenience. _________________ AHK tools by Drugwash |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Chavez
Joined: 20 Aug 2008 Posts: 256
|
Posted: Thu Nov 27, 2008 7:46 am Post subject: |
|
|
Awesome, thanks a lot Chris. _________________ -Chavez. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
derRaphael
Joined: 23 Nov 2007 Posts: 841 Location: ~/.
|
Posted: Sun Nov 30, 2008 5:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
while testing the new beta, i stumbled upon this issue, which at least should be mentioned in the ahk help-file (i also think this is a buggy behaviour on direct text assignments in forced expressions and the smart comma handling, but at least mentioning it in the help file resulted to post it into wish-list instead of bug reports):
msgbox documentation update
additionally maybe a workaround as suggested by lexikos in this thread about trapping focus and rendering the gui unusable ([code-a-pit] a very annoying standard windows behaviour) can also be build in into the 1.0.48 release
besides i did not expirience any errors yet.
greets
dR _________________
All scripts, unless otherwise noted, are hereby released under CC-BY |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
WhoAmIAgain Guest
|
Posted: Mon Dec 01, 2008 4:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I just tested it with all of my scripts and everything worked great and ran faster! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Joy2DWorld
Joined: 04 Dec 2006 Posts: 561 Location: Galil, Israel
|
Posted: Tue Dec 09, 2008 5:34 pm Post subject: Re: Beta version pre-v1.0.48: Up to 3x faster performance |
|
|
if helpful suggest,
include as built in function at least Lex' EVAL() function,
(and while at at, Sean's Invoke() ,
maybe even GUI, dock
)
EVAL() so important an extension to interp. langauge,
and Invoke() so basic to interface with com....
ps: very cool dev.... IMPRESSIVE! _________________ Joyce Jamce |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
HotKeyIt
Joined: 18 Jun 2008 Posts: 4653 Location: AHK Forum
|
Posted: Thu Dec 11, 2008 8:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
1000 thanks for 1000 max hotkeys
| Code: | chars := "abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789"
Loop, Parse, chars
{
char1 := A_LoopField
Loop, Parse, chars
{
If (char1 = A_LoopField)
continue
SetTimer, ExitApp, -2000
Hotkey, %char1% & %A_LoopField%, Test
count++
ToolTip % "Creating Hotkeys`nLast hotkey " char1 " & " A_LoopField "`nTotal created: " count " hotkeys."
}
}
Test:
Return
ExitApp:
ExitApp |
_________________ AHK_H (2alpha) AHF TT _Struct WatchDir Yaml _Input ObjTree RapidHotkey DynaRun  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Pandit Guest
|
Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2008 5:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I would like to ask a simple question – Would a file that is converted from .ahk to .exe also run faster by upgrading to the new Beta version pre-v1.0.48 or it would have no effect on compiled exe files in terms of speed?
Also if I were to upgrade to the Beta version pre-v1.0.48, must I rename the downloaded file as Autohotkey.exe or leave the filename as AutoHotkey-Pre-1.0.48-new2.exe |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lexikos
Joined: 17 Oct 2006 Posts: 7299 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2008 9:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
In order to compile a script with the beta, you would need an AutoHotkeySC.bin based on beta source code.
You do not need to rename the exe. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Laszlo
Joined: 14 Feb 2005 Posts: 4710 Location: Boulder, CO
|
Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2008 9:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Lexikos, could you post such an AutoHotkeySC.bin? It would be very nice to provide the speedups to people, who don't have AHK installed. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Lexikos
Joined: 17 Oct 2006 Posts: 7299 Location: Australia
|
Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2008 9:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Only Chris has the beta source code, afaik. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Icarus
Joined: 24 Nov 2005 Posts: 851
|
Posted: Tue Dec 16, 2008 9:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Judging by the lack of bug reports for the beta, it may be safe to assume that official release is coming soon. _________________ Sector-Seven - Freeware tools built with AutoHotkey |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
xazax
Joined: 12 Aug 2008 Posts: 16
|
Posted: Sat Dec 20, 2008 2:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
A question:
"To achieve full benefit we should avoid setformat."
If we use setformat the speed will be the same, slower or still a bit faster than before? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|