| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Guest
|
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 8:43 am Post subject: FinalBuilder vs AutoIt vs Autohotkey |
|
|
first of all i would like to thanks all our members for quick responses...i want one favour from all of you regarding the posted topic........
maybe in fewdays i have to tell my supervisor that which tool is better to use to automate a GUI application...from my point of view i think autohotkey is far better than finalbuilder and autoit
So is it possible for you people to post the advantages and disadvantages of FinalBuilder,AutoIt and Autohotkey so tht i can convince my supervisor to develop the application in Autohotkey
[ Moderator!: This topic will be moved to General Chat after the first reply ]
[Moderator's Note: This topic was moved from Ask For Help] |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Leef_me
Joined: 08 Apr 2009 Posts: 5336 Location: San Diego, California
|
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 9:04 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | ...from my point of view i think autohotkey is far better than finalbuilder and autoit |
I had not heard of FinalBuilder until your post.
So with the limited information of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FinalBuilder,
I'd suggest FB is not a tool to "... to use to automate a GUI application"
| Quote: | | ...so tht i can convince my supervisor to develop the application in Autohotkey |
Instead, why don't you automate some simple Gui application? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 9:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
yes you are right because with finalbuilder we cant execute a file from command prompt, also their are not many functions like autohotkey like clicking,imagesearch,.....etc.
so is Autohotkey better than Autoit because i see that mostly all library functions are same but there must be something which makes autohotkey better than autoit |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
doyle
Joined: 14 Nov 2007 Posts: 325 Location: London, England
|
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 9:38 am Post subject: |
|
|
AutoHotkey seems far more accessible.
Ive looked into AutoIt, and didnt like it.
The manual for AHK is a work of art imo. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 9:41 am Post subject: |
|
|
| even i think in the same way....well do you have any idea that whether it will be the same if use it on Windows 7??? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
doyle
Joined: 14 Nov 2007 Posts: 325 Location: London, England
|
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 9:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| More or less. Yes. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 9:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ok thanks lets see how it works maybe i will try it out on someones pc where windows7 is installed |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 9:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
| well in general chat section i found few postings regarding its compatability with windows 7 and the good news is that its working on windows 7...well i will try more to make it more clear |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Carcophan
Joined: 24 Dec 2008 Posts: 1308 Location: :noitacoL
|
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 3:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | The manual for AHK is a work of art imo. |
Quoted for truth  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
jethrow
Joined: 24 May 2009 Posts: 1907 Location: Iowa, USA
|
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 6:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I was thinking about switching to AutoIt, then Lexikos released AutoHotkey_L with object support. Now, IMO, AHK is much better than AutoIt. _________________
- in case I forgot to smile
Basic Webpage Controls
COM Object Reference |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
tank
Joined: 21 Dec 2007 Posts: 3700 Location: Louisville KY USA
|
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 6:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| jethrow wrote: | | I was thinking about switching to AutoIt, then Lexikos released AutoHotkey_L with object support. Now, IMO, AHK is much better than AutoIt. | same reasoning for me except i also apreciate stricter syntax. but if the unicode and ahk_l versions ever get merged to the main i think i will be just as content _________________
We are troubled on every side‚ yet not distressed; we are perplexed‚
but not in despair; Persecuted‚ but not forsaken; cast down‚ but not destroyed; |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
majkinetor
Joined: 24 May 2006 Posts: 4511 Location: Belgrade
|
Posted: Tue Nov 17, 2009 10:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I couldn't agree more. _________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
wiseley
Joined: 22 Apr 2009 Posts: 29
|
Posted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 11:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
| To mine opinion, there is no match to ahk at this moment. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
AHKnow
Joined: 03 Jul 2004 Posts: 121
|
Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:47 am Post subject: |
|
|
AutoHotkey is unmatched and has about won the "war" over AutoIT, though it was really just a quasi-war over preferences, in the first place.
IronAHK blows the doors off. It is like bringing out a nuke in WW2. AutoHotkey as .NET/Mono and running on Windows or Linux is just crazy.
The only place you can go after that, is to go codeless and visual. That language is Limnor.
Limnor , http://www.limnor.com/ , has a new version out that works with Visual Studio. It allows you to create C# programs with almost no coding and visually.
I think IronAHK (automation orientated) and Limnor (plays nice with databases among other things) compliment each other tremendously as .NET languages and create some very interesting possibilities. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
KingIrish
Joined: 16 Mar 2010 Posts: 2 Location: Minco, Oklahoma
|
Posted: Fri Mar 19, 2010 5:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm actually rather completely new to AHK but I was into AutoIT a while back. The script language was concentrated heavily on Windows XP. None of my Vista using friends could run any scripts I compiled and sent. When I upgraded to Windows 7 recently I found myself without a quick and handy little script tool which doesn't take much to learn and is rather self commenting.
Hence, me switching to AutoHotKeys once I heard about it. I would recommend AHK for your project, simply because it's more versatile. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|