| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
trik
Joined: 15 Jul 2007 Posts: 1320
|
Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 12:48 pm Post subject: Validating Function and Variable Names |
|
|
| Code: | vfv(n) { ; vfv(n) : n - Name of function or variable : true if valid else false
Return !RegExMatch(n, "^[^#$0-9@-\[\]_a-z-]{1,253}$")
} |
Usage:
| Code: | s := "#$0123456789@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[]_abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz8593751111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111"
#$0123456789@ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ[]_abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz8593751111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111111(x) {
Return x
}
%s% := s
MsgBox % vfv(s) . "`r`n" . %s%("abc")
MsgBox % vfv(v) . "`r`n" . %s% |
As you can see, the parameters for a function name are equal to that of a variable. _________________ Religion is false. >_>
Last edited by trik on Thu Feb 25, 2010 1:32 pm; edited 10 times in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Tuncay n-l-i mobile Guest
|
Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 1:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
good to have. I may use that at my project. But i do not like the name of the function. I prefer more "isValidName()".
At home i take a more detail look at this. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
trik
Joined: 15 Jul 2007 Posts: 1320
|
Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 1:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Tuncay n-l-i mobile wrote: | | But i do not like the name of the function. I prefer more "isValidName()". |
You are more than welcome to change the function name to whatever you wish, but I prefer ValidFunctionOrVariable(Name). I shortened to vfv(n). _________________ Religion is false. >_> |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dR* Guest
|
Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 3:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Code: | vfv(n) { ; vfv(n) : n - Name of function or variable : true if valid else false
Return !RegExMatch(n, "[^#0-\[\]-]{1,253}") ; Would it be faster without the logical-not and circumflex?
}
msgbox % vfv( "ya;:as" ) ? "YES" : "NO" |
fails.
try using more precise needles such as \x30-\x39 and such
greets
dR |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
trik
Joined: 15 Jul 2007 Posts: 1320
|
Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 3:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| dR* wrote: | | Code: | vfv(n) { ; vfv(n) : n - Name of function or variable : true if valid else false
Return !RegExMatch(n, "[^#0-\[\]-]{1,253}") ; Would it be faster without the logical-not and circumflex?
}
msgbox % vfv( "ya;:as" ) ? "YES" : "NO" |
fails.
try using more precise needles such as \x30-\x39 and such
greets
dR |
I thought I cut those characters out while I was making the RegEx.. I will fix it in a few minutes.
Edit: Updated function to the following:
| Code: | vfv(n) { ; vfv(n) : n - Name of function or variable : true if valid else false
Return !RegExMatch(n, "[^#0-9@-\[\]-]{1,253}")
} |
_________________ Religion is false. >_> |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dr* Guest
|
Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 4:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
still fails
| Code: | | msgbox % vfv( "y{es}no" ) ? "YES" : "NO" |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
trik
Joined: 15 Jul 2007 Posts: 1320
|
Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 4:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Code: | 35 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 93 95 97 98 99
100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137
138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171
172 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205
206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238
239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 |
That is what I sift through to find bad ranges. I hope you can understand why I keep missing some.
Updated the code to:
| Code: | vfv(n) { ; vfv(n) : n - Name of function or variable : true if valid else false
Return !RegExMatch(n, "[^#0-9@-\[\]_a-z---]{1,253}")
; Hex needle: [^\x23\x30-\x39\x40-\x5b\x5d\x5f\x61-\x7a\x80-\x9f\xa1-\xac\xae-\xff]{1,253}
} |
_________________ Religion is false. >_> |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dr* Guest
|
Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 5:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Code: | | msgbox % vfv( "$YEAH" ) ? "YES" : "NO" |
fail |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
trik
Joined: 15 Jul 2007 Posts: 1320
|
Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 5:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| dr* wrote: | | Code: | | msgbox % vfv( "$YEAH" ) ? "YES" : "NO" |
fail |
>_>
| Code: | vfv(n) { ; vfv(n) : n - Name of function or variable : true if valid else false
Return !RegExMatch(n, "[^#$0-9@-\[\]_a-z---]{1,253}")
; Hex needle: [^\x23\x24\x30-\x39\x40-\x5b\x5d\x5f\x61-\x7a\x80-\x9f\xa1-\xac\xae-\xff]{1,253}
} |
_________________ Religion is false. >_> |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
dR* Guest
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
trik
Joined: 15 Jul 2007 Posts: 1320
|
Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 5:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
An ANSI table does not know which characters AutoHotkey does or does not allow into its functions and variables. _________________ Religion is false. >_> |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 5:25 pm Post subject: HORIZ SCROLLING SUCKS |
|
|
| OMG...I now have a widescreen monitor & this thread STILL gives me horiz scrolling!...aaaahhhh! |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
trik
Joined: 15 Jul 2007 Posts: 1320
|
Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 5:26 pm Post subject: Re: HORIZ SCROLLING SUCKS |
|
|
| Anonymous wrote: | | OMG...I now have a widescreen monitor & this thread STILL gives me horiz scrolling!...aaaahhhh! |
I would break the lines, but then the function in the example would not work. Anyway, it looks just fine to me in 1024x1280 and 768x1366. _________________ Religion is false. >_> |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Guest
|
Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 5:59 pm Post subject: Re: HORIZ SCROLLING SUCKS |
|
|
| trik wrote: | | I would break the lines... |
...a really simple solution is to add about 5 lines (comment lines or blank lines) to the code so it auto-collapses...(a better solution requires me editing the sites code.js)...
| trik wrote: | | Anyway, it looks just fine to me... |
...that's not possible...
| trik wrote: | | ...in 1024x1280 and 768x1366. |
...did you swap the numbers?...or is your monitor really in portrait?...(which would make you have more horiz scrolling)? Mine is 1280x720 & has horiz scrolling (1280 is horiz/x, 720 is vertical/y)... |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
trik
Joined: 15 Jul 2007 Posts: 1320
|
Posted: Wed Feb 24, 2010 6:01 pm Post subject: Re: HORIZ SCROLLING SUCKS |
|
|
| Anonymous wrote: | | ...did you swap the numbers?...or is your monitor really in portrait?...(which would make you have more horiz scrolling)? Mine is 1280x720 & has horiz scrolling (1280 is horiz/x, 720 is vertical/y)... |
Whoops. I did swap them, yes. _________________ Religion is false. >_> |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|