AutoHotkey Homepage AutoHotkey Community
Let's help each other out
 
 FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

AHK[U] || AHK_L || AHK_H || ...

 
Reply to topic    AutoHotkey Community Forum Index -> General Chat
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
BoBo³
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 8:53 am    Post subject: AHK[U] || AHK_L || AHK_H || ... Reply with quote

I thought it would make sense to request that an "Ask for Help" needs to contain the information about which flav(o)ur of AHK is used. Standard AHK or AHK_L/_H/U/.. .

Meanwhile it is getting a little bit confusing, isn't it? Sad
Back to top
Tuncay



Joined: 07 Nov 2006
Posts: 1886
Location: Germany

PostPosted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 12:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I am still using standard AHK. There is only one script where I need Unicode, and first I used AHK_U. Later after AHK_U and AHK_L are merged, I am using AHK_L for that script.

If AHK_L (+U) is more robust someday I went to that version from Lexikos. Very interesting is also IronAHK from Titan. Other versions sounds also interesting, but I cannot dive in all variants. They should be merged into one solution.

Standard AHK needs Unicode mostly. Other features are just features, Unicode is essential!
_________________
{1:"ahkstdlib", 2:"my libs", 3:"my apps", 4:"my license"}
--> Don't feed the troll! <--
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
tank



Joined: 21 Dec 2007
Posts: 3700
Location: Louisville KY USA

PostPosted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 3:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

absolutely it is a great idea but then i suppose we need a scripts and functions bug reports and announcements sections as well
_________________

We are troubled on every side‚ yet not distressed; we are perplexed‚
but not in despair; Persecuted‚ but not forsaken; cast down‚ but not destroyed;
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SoLong&Thx4AllTheFish



Joined: 27 May 2007
Posts: 4999

PostPosted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 4:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

tank wrote:
absolutely it is a great idea but then i suppose we need a scripts and functions bug reports and announcements sections as well
The problem is that people now report bugs without telling they are using the non standard version so in the Ask for Help it is sometimes hard to tell. But Lexikos said somewhere they are working / thinking on something after majkinetor suggested something similar.
_________________
AHK Wiki FAQ
TF : Text files & strings lib, TF Forum
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jethrow



Joined: 24 May 2009
Posts: 1907
Location: Iowa, USA

PostPosted: Thu Mar 11, 2010 4:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Also, for the record, AHK[U] isn't really a valid candidate anymore -
jackieku wrote:
AutoHotkey_L has been merged with AutoHotkeyU. Please use AutoHotkey_L instead.

As Tuncay mentioned though, this could get very interesting/confusing when IronAHK is finalized ( unless Titan starts a separate forum ). To agree with BoBo³, when in the AHK forum & posting code / asking questions ( if you're not referring to the standard AHK release ) you really need to clarify what build you're referring to.
_________________
Very Happy - in case I forgot to smile
Basic Webpage Controls
COM Object Reference
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website Yahoo Messenger
TLM



Joined: 21 Aug 2006
Posts: 2926
Location: The Shell

PostPosted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 12:46 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Its great that this is brought to the fore. I was wondering where to post questions about AHK_L. It would be ideal if there was a single place for all info no?
_________________
paradigm.shift:=(•_•)┌П┐RTFM||^.*∞
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
AHKnow*
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Mar 12, 2010 5:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

AHK_L is like almost a fork. The issue is that the standard version is not being updated much, where AHK_L is. So because of the additional features and frequency of updates, AHK_L is slowly, but steadily, becoming the quite standard.

IronAHK, looks to be huge. It will be a clear fork and need it's own section by itself on the AutoHotkey forum because of a lot of .NET questions it is sure to generate.

I think it would still be better to have AHK_L and IronAHK on the AutoHotkey forum, because the language is AutoHotkey and there will be a lot of things in common between the forks and standard AutoHotkey. However, just like General Chat is it's own section, I think AHK_L, and most definitely, IronAHK need their own sections.
Back to top
HotKeyIt



Joined: 18 Jun 2008
Posts: 4652
Location: AHK Forum

PostPosted: Sat Mar 13, 2010 9:42 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The best way would be possibly an obligatory DropDownList for all Autohotkey forum sections
Whenever you create new topic you are forced to select which version your script, wish, question or bug is referring to.

Also Search should provide such a DropDownList I think.
_________________
AHK_H (2alpha) AHF TT _Struct WatchDir Yaml _Input ObjTree RapidHotkey DynaRun Wink
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Reply to topic    AutoHotkey Community Forum Index -> General Chat All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You can post new topics in this forum
You can reply to topics in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group