| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
toralf
Joined: 31 Jan 2005
Posts: 3842
Location: Bremen, Germany
|
 Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2006 10:19 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| Chris wrote: | | open-braces of the One True Brace style do not support commands to their right |
That is vice. Since it would be even harder to adjust Auto-Syntax-Tidy to it. I'm currently expending it to allow OTB and that is pretty tricky already.
When can new GUI controls be awaited? May I start with Misha's TreeControl dll, or are the AHK commands comming any time soon?
_________________
Ciao
toralf  |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Titan
Joined: 11 Aug 2004
Posts: 5007
Location: imaginationland
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2006 12:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| PhiLho wrote: | | And with no clear advantage over the OTB style, ie. no gain of line. Well, at least, braces are aligned, I find this more readable than OTB. |
Wherever you can't use OTB (like parsing loops?) this allows you to use the line taken by the open brace. It's not so bad, I'd do it - I guess I have an ugly coding style 
_________________
RegExReplace("irc.freenode.net/autohotkey", "^(?=(.(?=[\0-r\[]*((?<=\.).))))(?:[c-\x73]{2,8}(\S))+((2)|\b[^\2-]){2}\D++$", "$u3$1$3$4$2") |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Chris
Site Admin
Joined: 02 Mar 2004
Posts: 10450
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2006 1:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| toralf wrote: | | When can new GUI controls be awaited? |
The Tree control and perhaps a few others are expected to be done sometime between v43 and v45. v42 will probably be more enhancements to context-sensitive hotkeys and hotstrings.
As for timing, v42 should be out within a week, and the others usually follow at about 2 or 3 week intervals. But as always, these are rough estimates that depend on how long R&D actually takes, as well as how much time I have. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
toralf
Joined: 31 Jan 2005
Posts: 3842
Location: Bremen, Germany
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2006 1:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
*Happy*
So if v42 comes within a week,
v43 will be 3 weeks or end of February.
v44 will be 5 weeks
v45 will be 7 weeks or end of March.
So, if everything goes straight we will have something new to play with in March/April :)))
I'll do my best to get you as much time as possible. :)))
_________________
Ciao
toralf |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Chris
Site Admin
Joined: 02 Mar 2004
Posts: 10450
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2006 2:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| In v1.0.41.02, "GuiControl Move" was changed to eliminate flickering when resizing or moving controls [thanks Serenity]. However, this may cause painting artifacts for some control types under certain circumstances. If so, please update your scripts to use GuiControl MoveDraw instead. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
toralf
Joined: 31 Jan 2005
Posts: 3842
Location: Bremen, Germany
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2006 2:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks. By the shift of the commands it will even save me to update my scripts. :))
_________________
Ciao
toralf |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Titan
Joined: 11 Aug 2004
Posts: 5007
Location: imaginationland
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2006 3:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Chris wrote: | | In v1.0.41.02, "GuiControl Move" was changed to eliminate flickering when resizing or moving controls [thanks Serenity]. |
Although some flickering occurs, it's definetly a major improvement. Thanks.
_________________
RegExReplace("irc.freenode.net/autohotkey", "^(?=(.(?=[\0-r\[]*((?<=\.).))))(?:[c-\x73]{2,8}(\S))+((2)|\b[^\2-]){2}\D++$", "$u3$1$3$4$2") |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Chris
Site Admin
Joined: 02 Mar 2004
Posts: 10450
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2006 3:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Thanks; I'll change it to say "reduce" vs. "eliminate". |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kapege.de
Joined: 07 Feb 2005
Posts: 186
Location: Munich, Germany
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2006 3:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Much better! To see the difference within minutes is cool. Despite it hasn't hurt me before. The ListView is stable now, only a very little flicker is in the frame (w2000). Has to test it w/ W98 @ home later today.
Thanx!
_________________
Peter
Wisenheiming for beginners: KaPeGe (German only, sorry) |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Harmor
Joined: 06 Nov 2005
Posts: 183
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 01, 2006 7:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Thanks for the Window specific hotkeys.
Perhaps next version you can get process specific hotkeys as well.
i.e. #IfProgram Notepad.exe
_________________
//TODO: Create kewl sig... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Chris
Site Admin
Joined: 02 Mar 2004
Posts: 10450
|
| Posted: Thu Feb 02, 2006 1:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
Although process-specific hotkeys probably won't be added, you could use #IfWin with an ahk_group containing some ahk_pid entries for your processes. Alternatively, ahk_class might be more suitable than a process name in many cases.
If there is demand, a WinTitle of ahk_process could be supported so that you can specify a process name with any windowing command. However, I don't recall this ever being requested, so it seems unlikely many people would use it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
JSLover
Joined: 20 Dec 2004
Posts: 542
Location: LooseChange911.com... the WTC attacks were done by the US Gov't... the official story is a lie...
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2006 5:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Chris wrote: | | ...ahk_process could be supported... However, I don't recall this ever being requested... |
Also, you could overload WinGet...
My suggestion was for ahk_pn, but I did semi-request it...(if you add either, please add ahk_pn as a shortcut to ahk_process...it's short & sweet, like ahk_id & ahk_pid). I'd also like ahk_title, then you could support multiple titles or support a title as not the being 1st param...there may be other uses, supporting a title where it currently ain't supported (I can't think of an example tho).
_________________
LooseChange911.com • See Loose Change (click image!) • LC Blog |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Chris
Site Admin
Joined: 02 Mar 2004
Posts: 10450
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 03, 2006 1:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| JSLover wrote: | | please add ahk_pn as a shortcut to ahk_process...it's short & sweet, like ahk_id & ahk_pid). |
I've made a note to consider it (assuming process name ever gets added).
| Quote: | | I'd also like ahk_title, then you could support multiple titles or support a title as not the being 1st param |
It seems overly complicated given rarity of use and that GroupAdd+ahk_group can already do it. But I'd welcome any real-world examples that demonstrate otherwise. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
