AutoHotkey_L has been merged with AutoHotkeyU. Please use AutoHotkey_L instead.
AutoHotkeyU - AutoHotkey_L with Unicode supports
The sources are available at <!-- m -->git://ku.myftp.org/autohotkey.git<!-- m --> via Git. Browse the repository with the web interface. (ChangeLog)
Please see this wiki article for more details.
Read the 'Script compatibility' section if your scripts don't work.
Download:
AutoHotkeyU (AutoHotkeySC.bin included) commit 3804d380dbbd56ad9787f9e42ef0cac084099a28 (based on AutoHotkey_L rev.41)
XDebugClient for AutoHotkeyU (patched to handle UTF-8, the patch is included in the package.)
UNICODE version of AutoHotkey
Started by
jackieku
, Oct 29 2009 08:33 AM
181 replies to this topic
#1
-
Posted 29 October 2009 - 08:33 AM
Awesome
After a quick test it looks to work, I will test more as soon as I can
Thanks for the source code as well.
After a quick test it looks to work, I will test more as soon as I can
Thanks for the source code as well.
#2
-
Posted 29 October 2009 - 10:40 AM
This is great news
I would give it a try if i get home.
by the way, is your version base on Lexikos's Ahk_L?
I would give it a try if i get home.
by the way, is your version base on Lexikos's Ahk_L?
#3
-
Posted 29 October 2009 - 11:41 AM
Can someone explain to us non computer science folks why this is such good news? With that info, I too can be excited :wink:
#7
-
Posted 29 October 2009 - 03:09 PM
Perhaps this thread should be stickied for the time being to draw attention over a longer period of time and get people to test it :?:
Edit: and yes it will surely help make AHK to become even more popular so congratulations on your work
Edit: and yes it will surely help make AHK to become even more popular so congratulations on your work
#9
-
Posted 29 October 2009 - 04:44 PM
Can someone explain to us non computer science folks why this is such good news? With that info, I too can be excited :wink:
Just because it is превосходно
And yes I agree this should be made sticky, now many more users will be interested in AutoHotkey I think
#10
-
Posted 29 October 2009 - 05:47 PM
I was about to reconsider my choice in favor of AutoIt. Now there is a chance to continue using AutoHotkey!
#11
-
Posted 29 October 2009 - 08:19 PM
I found a bug..
It appends an empty file..
BUT: because of I am using linux, Is is possible for someone in Windows to test that?
Gui, Add, Edit, x46 y37 w330 h20 vonomatainias, Gui, Add, Button, x116 y767 w180 h50 , Ok ; Generated using SmartGUI Creator 4.0 Gui, Show, x166 y117 h880 w420, New GUI Window Return GuiClose: ExitApp ButtonOK: Gui, Submit, nohide fileappend, %onomatainias%, %onomatainias%.txt
It appends an empty file..
BUT: because of I am using linux, Is is possible for someone in Windows to test that?
#12
-
Posted 29 October 2009 - 11:25 PM
I'd like to know how many trailing bytes VarSetCapacity adds to the end of the variable, 1 or 2? I suppose it better be 2 with the unicode build. BTW, NumGet/NumPut didn't work as expected.
VarSetCapacity(x,2,1) MsgBox, % NumGet(x) ; not work ; MsgBox, % NumGet(&x) ; workOK, I reckon it's 2-byte base.
MsgBox % VarSetCapacity(x,3) "|" VarSetCapacity(y,4) MsgBox % VarSetCapacity(z,1,1) "|" NumGet(&z)
#14
-
Posted 30 October 2009 - 01:03 AM
Wicked good news. Now maybe I don't need to learn PowerShell with WASP/PowerBoots/White to do up a UI unit test suite for a piece of oss. I am SO glad that I can leverage my ahk skillsets to this end now.!.
Quite simply, THANK YOU!!!
-t
Quite simply, THANK YOU!!!
-t
#15
-
Posted 30 October 2009 - 03:48 AM
When replying, please feel free to address me as Tod. My AHK.net site...