CloudAHK
http://cloudahk.com/
AutoHotkey:Build is a web service that allows you to code, compile, and download right from the browser without installing a single thing.
This is currently Alpha 0.1, because I wrote it about 30 minutes ago and completely stole the AutoHotkey.net design. But it works in it's current state.
Some notes: Don't use spaces in the app name, it will hang.
I plan on making it all ajax so you can continue to test and edit. Maybe ase/bespin for code editing. Probably some other junk idk yet.
But there are bugs and issues and I'll work on it all later.
Please give it a try, I think once it's stable and clean it should be moved to <!-- m -->http://build.autohotkey.net<!-- m -->. but that will only happen if y'all think it's worthy.
Now added support to import from the autohotkey.net pastbin.
For example.
if your paste is:
<!-- m -->https://ahknet.autoh...m/paste/1pulxvt<!-- m -->
Just use
<!-- m -->http://cloudahk.com/?paste=1pulxvt<!-- m -->
Or just use the Chrome or Firefox extension.
Download
Chrome:
<!-- m -->http://cloudahk.com/...loudAHK.user.js<!-- m -->
Firefox:
<!-- m -->http://cloudahk.com/...ox/CloudAHK.xpi<!-- m -->
CloudAHK - Cloud Compiling
Started by
octal
, Jan 18 2012 08:52 PM
75 replies to this topic
#1
-
Posted 18 January 2012 - 08:52 PM
I'm quite amazed I had wanted to do something like this, because that way scripts & apps can theoretically be 100% open-source online, while still retaining ease-of-usage in compling. Very-good.
#2
-
Posted 18 January 2012 - 09:27 PM
Thanks sumon. I have many plans for this, like the ability to include frameworks. and icons you can select from. Possibly accounts where you can edit and store your code? Pre build templates? Examples and samples?
Any ideas you have would be great.
Any ideas you have would be great.
#3
-
Posted 18 January 2012 - 09:40 PM
Damn... That's cool!
#4
-
Posted 19 January 2012 - 06:24 PM
Thanks!
It's something I've wanted to do for a while but never really got around to.
Here's a preview of the next version. The idea is you can continue to edit and test as if it was an IDE.
It's something I've wanted to do for a while but never really got around to.
Here's a preview of the next version. The idea is you can continue to edit and test as if it was an IDE.
#5
-
Posted 19 January 2012 - 09:53 PM
Now what would be awesome is if someone could create the syntax highlighting file for the ace editor I'm going to be using.
You can find some examples here.
<!-- m -->https://github.com/a...aster/build/src<!-- m -->
I have no clue whats going on.
You can find some examples here.
<!-- m -->https://github.com/a...aster/build/src<!-- m -->
I have no clue whats going on.
#6
-
Posted 19 January 2012 - 09:58 PM
Looks cool. :!:
[*:4zogaqod]Some features from Compile_AHK maybe?
[*:4zogaqod]What about github support? Post-receive hooks to build the code (stored on github) each time it changes?Any ideas you have would be great.
[*:4zogaqod]Some features from Compile_AHK maybe?
#8
-
Posted 20 January 2012 - 03:05 PM
Join the discussion on The future of AutoHotkey
Visit me on github
Win7 HP SP1 64bit | AHK_L U 64bit
Visit me on github
Win7 HP SP1 64bit | AHK_L U 64bit
Ah github support would be awesome. Except I use Google code and svn so I'd probably implement that first.
So you'd just like to be able to input a github url to compile from right?
I plan on adding some other options like uploading a file, and I guess github and svn should be added.
So you'd just like to be able to input a github url to compile from right?
I plan on adding some other options like uploading a file, and I guess github and svn should be added.
#9
-
Posted 20 January 2012 - 03:14 PM
*Posting random ideas*
However, what I meant originally:
Github allows you to set so-called "service hooks", web apps that are launched when I update the code. So I'd got to my repo's administration, select the hook (a simple "post-receive url" might be enough), enter "http://build.poopballs.com/github/build" or similar, and then, whenever I change my code on github, the code is automatically rebuilt.
But actually this is not the best idea. I like you idea better, especially if it was also possible to define the repo in the url ("build.poopballs.com/build?repo_url=github.com/user/project"). Maybe it is possible to make it work independently of git / svn. AFAIK both github & googlecode provide the option to download the code as zip: maybe that could be used.
That would be an idea, and sounds easy to implement.So you'd just like to be able to input a github url to compile from right?
However, what I meant originally:
Github allows you to set so-called "service hooks", web apps that are launched when I update the code. So I'd got to my repo's administration, select the hook (a simple "post-receive url" might be enough), enter "http://build.poopballs.com/github/build" or similar, and then, whenever I change my code on github, the code is automatically rebuilt.
But actually this is not the best idea. I like you idea better, especially if it was also possible to define the repo in the url ("build.poopballs.com/build?repo_url=github.com/user/project"). Maybe it is possible to make it work independently of git / svn. AFAIK both github & googlecode provide the option to download the code as zip: maybe that could be used.
#10
-
Posted 20 January 2012 - 03:23 PM
Join the discussion on The future of AutoHotkey
Visit me on github
Win7 HP SP1 64bit | AHK_L U 64bit
Visit me on github
Win7 HP SP1 64bit | AHK_L U 64bit
Yeah I think it would be awesome if you could show the code. Then click a link that compiles an downloads the app.
So it's like. Here's the source, see what it's doing? Now compile and download, or change something if you'd like.
So it's like. Here's the source, see what it's doing? Now compile and download, or change something if you'd like.
#11
-
Posted 20 January 2012 - 05:31 PM
#12
-
Posted 20 January 2012 - 07:25 PM
THIS IS AMAZING
#13
-
Posted 21 January 2012 - 01:46 AM
Thanks man!
What would you like to see implemented?
What would you like to see implemented?
#14
-
Posted 21 January 2012 - 04:40 AM
Hmmm...
Is it possible that clicking the build button starts the download? So it's one click, instead of two (I know, no big deal )
The only other improvements that I can see have to do with the "IDE" - syntax highlighting, javscript-powered tooltips with command syntax, javascript-powered autocompletion of words, etc. I recognize that these are difficult to implement, and I'm in no rush
Edit: someone voted no to the poll. Care to explain why?
Is it possible that clicking the build button starts the download? So it's one click, instead of two (I know, no big deal )
The only other improvements that I can see have to do with the "IDE" - syntax highlighting, javscript-powered tooltips with command syntax, javascript-powered autocompletion of words, etc. I recognize that these are difficult to implement, and I'm in no rush
Edit: someone voted no to the poll. Care to explain why?
#15
-
Posted 21 January 2012 - 04:42 PM