by Datapoint » 06 Feb 2024, 22:39
kiwichick wrote: ↑06 Feb 2024, 17:42
the Rosetta wiki page for Programming Languages lists one for AutoHotkey and two for AutoHotkey v2
That's unfortunate. v2 should not be listed there. Rosetta Code has pages for
implementations, and pages for
languages. All versions of AHK are part of the same
language. Different versions should be
noted as separate implementations.
kiwichick wrote:
I don't know how you got to the AutoHotkey 1.1 page
Navigation is trash on that site. We could do a better job of adding links on the main Autohotkey page and other sections like implementations. Most of the work on that site has been done incrementally over many years, so it may be out of date. Also, it's done by different users, so the consistency is lacking.
[quote=kiwichick post_id=558187 time=1707259344 user_id=57047]
the Rosetta wiki page for Programming Languages lists one for AutoHotkey and two for AutoHotkey v2
[/quote]That's unfortunate. v2 should not be listed there. Rosetta Code has pages for [url=https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Category:Implementations][i]implementations[/i][/url], and pages for [url=https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Category:Programming_Languages][i]languages[/i][/url]. All versions of AHK are part of the same [i]language[/i]. Different versions should be [url=https://rosettacode.org/wiki/Category:AutoHotkey_Implementations]noted as separate [i]implementations[/i][/url].
[quote=kiwichick]
I don't know how you got to the AutoHotkey 1.1 page
[/quote]Navigation is trash on that site. We could do a better job of adding links on the main Autohotkey page and other sections like implementations. Most of the work on that site has been done incrementally over many years, so it may be out of date. Also, it's done by different users, so the consistency is lacking.