lexikosisms

Post a reply


In an effort to prevent automatic submissions, we require that you complete the following challenge.
Smilies
:D :) ;) :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :!: :?: :idea: :| :mrgreen: :geek: :ugeek: :arrow: :angel: :clap: :crazy: :eh: :lolno: :problem: :shh: :shifty: :sick: :silent: :think: :thumbup: :thumbdown: :salute: :wave: :wtf: :yawn: :facepalm: :bravo: :dance: :beard: :morebeard: :xmas: :HeHe: :trollface: :cookie: :rainbow: :monkeysee: :monkeysay: :happybday: :headwall: :offtopic: :superhappy: :terms: :beer:
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is OFF
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: lexikosisms

Re: lexikosisms

Post by joedf » 06 Apr 2015, 19:57

regex selector hehe ;)
/lexi[kc]osisms/g

Re: lexikosisms

Post by fischgeek » 06 Apr 2015, 11:38

Hahaha!
Of course; if it was inevitable, there would be little point in Lexikos' previous argument.

Re: lexikosisms

Post by tank » 06 Apr 2015, 11:08

My favorite thing was when people kept refering to him as lexicos so he finally made an account to match it
http://www.autohotkey.com/board/index.p ... y&mid=7489
the funniest was
http://www.autohotkey.com/board/topic/5 ... ntry334676

http://www.autohotkey.com/board/topic/7 ... t&p=450882

Re: lexikosisms

Post by tank » 06 Apr 2015, 11:02

fischgeek wrote:haha. yeah. We did this for tank once. I remember everyone had a quote of his in their signature. I was something like: Unfortunately, COM for Dummies is a lot like Brain Surgery for Dummies. In the end, you're just going to have to learn it
Ah i did love that one

Re: lexikosisms

Post by Relayer » 06 Apr 2015, 10:57

Just ran into one that made me chuckle:

"v1.1.19.03 can't run broken scripts any more than other versions."

This was in response to someone suggesting a newer version will solve a problem they have.

Relayer

Re: lexikosisms

Post by joedf » 31 Mar 2015, 15:13

Lol XD yep haha

Re: lexikosisms

Post by fischgeek » 31 Mar 2015, 11:46

haha. yeah. We did this for tank once. I remember everyone had a quote of his in their signature. I was something like: Unfortunately, COM for Dummies is a lot like Brain Surgery for Dummies. In the end, you're just going to have to learn it

Re: lexikosisms

Post by joedf » 31 Mar 2015, 11:18

Also, to say nothing in a topic specifically about him lol

Re: lexikosisms

Post by fischgeek » 31 Mar 2015, 11:01

I was reading through a few posts we had back and forth about some GUI changes and (taken out of context) in that was this line:
lexicos wrote:so perhaps I'll do what I normally do in such cases: nothing.

Re: lexikosisms

Post by guest3456 » 16 Mar 2015, 00:06

lol yes this guy is quite the character sometimes

Re: lexikosisms

Post by joedf » 14 Mar 2015, 12:33

lexikosisms... :lol: :+1:

Re: lexikosisms

Post by Coco » 14 Mar 2015, 02:03

Lol. Yeah, I had my doubts that he had decided not to implement it but I thought I'd give it a try. Had he not mentioned it in the post I linked, I probably wouldn't have proceeded.

lexikosisms

Post by jethrow » 14 Mar 2015, 01:42

Can't resist, this may be the funniest reply I've read from lexikos:
Coco wrote:... will you also consider Backport v2 quoted literal "strings"/'strings' duality.? You did mention it here.
lexikos wrote:As implied by omission from my previous post, I do not plan to implement it ...
... gotta love the level of directness :)

Note: I'm not bashing Coco in the least ... I thought it was a pretty legit question at first ...

Top