Lisps, Common Lisp and Lispworks

Post a reply


In an effort to prevent automatic submissions, we require that you complete the following challenge.
Smilies
:D :) ;) :( :o :shock: :? 8-) :lol: :x :P :oops: :cry: :evil: :twisted: :roll: :!: :?: :idea: :| :mrgreen: :geek: :ugeek: :arrow: :angel: :clap: :crazy: :eh: :lolno: :problem: :shh: :shifty: :sick: :silent: :think: :thumbup: :thumbdown: :salute: :wave: :wtf: :yawn: :facepalm: :bravo: :dance: :beard: :morebeard: :xmas: :HeHe: :trollface: :cookie: :rainbow: :monkeysee: :monkeysay: :happybday: :headwall: :offtopic: :superhappy: :terms: :beer:
View more smilies

BBCode is ON
[img] is OFF
[flash] is OFF
[url] is ON
Smilies are ON

Topic review
   

Expand view Topic review: Lisps, Common Lisp and Lispworks

Lisps, Common Lisp and Lispworks

Post by LazarouJoinery » 13 Dec 2022, 08:16

Hi all;

Has anyone any experience (learning curve time, maybe?) with any lisps? Specifically Common Lisp and Lispworks.
I've had a half-hearted attempt at learning CL before, and I think my mistake was struggling along with the completely unfamiliar Portacle/Emacs as my springboard.
My only programming experience comes from dipping into and out of AHK, with the sensational resources (both CHM help manual, and the unbelievable community)

As I mature - and my eyesight starts to go - I yearn for a more expressive language. Less cluttered than what my AHK seems to come out. And my coding style - pragmatic, frequent checking - could maybe benefit from a REPL
I had a peek at Red/Rebol as also reviewed in this forum, and it kinda speaks of parts of lisp, that lispers crow about - a REPL, DSLs, expressive, functional, symbolic.

Any opinions welcome :-)
I'm especially interested to hear of any ways/directions, that lisp could be considered a next-step after AHK :-)

Top