AutoHotkey Community

Instead of the keyboard shortcut, maybe send the character itself. No-Break Space is U+00A0. So maybe:

This is the code shown in your image and ported to AHK. The language ID's are listed at the link in the comments. oWord := ComObjActive("Word.Application") wdRussian := 1049 ; https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/office/vba/api/Word.wdlanguageid oWord.Selection.WholeStory oWord.Selection.LanguageID := ...

It's probably because as you are looping through an object you are also removing items from the object. When an item is removed from the object the remaining item indexes get shifted by one. One solution is to loop though the array in reverse order. Compare the following for-loop to the while-loop: ...

Convert to string in case it is a pure number: IsDigit(String(x))

You would also need to check if it's blank, as has been pointed out.

There's also a built in function: https://www.autohotkey.com/docs/v2/lib/Is.htm#digit

MsgBox IsDigit('123')

You could connect to the Outlook Event that is fired when an email is received. Here is a function/example I wrote that could be adapted: v1 example It's v1 code, but it would be almost identical in v2. Look for the heading that says "Outlook Events". You will need to un-comment the function NewMail...

One of these maybe: str := "This is a simple sentence!`nThis is a second sentence in line two.`nThis is also a sentence. You should find this line of text!`nLine_Next.`nLine_Next." ;RegExMatch - find the second sentence on one line RegExMatch(str, "[!.?]\h\K[^\v]+", match) MsgBox % match ;RegExMatch...

Here you go:

For some reason I don't seem to be able to use standard.MaxIndex() Try the for-loop or loop like here. I would usually use a for-loop for an array. Both work. standard := ["case", "b", "c"] for myKey, myVal in standard { MsgBox % myKey "`n" myVal } ; Or use a % to force an expression. https://www.a...

I don't disagree. Falsehoods are also not eradicated by continually discussing them as an alternative to the truth. I was playing the devil's advocate because there is nuance. This thread is basically a lot of very good arguments in favor of science. If we are arguing against an insignificant minori...

I can empathize with Ernestheili 's point, so I'll play the devil's advocate for a bit. This thread "feeds the trolls" by simply mentioning the idea. No matter how you attempt to disprove it, giving more attention to the "debate" lends it more credibility and further propagates it. Debating a flat e...

Glad to hear it's working for you. It happends quite often to me that I find the solution in VBA code and then I don't know to how to convert it in "COM/AHK" code. Does exist some tutorial to operate this conversion? There are lots of examples on the forum that can be found with google or the like. ...

the Rosetta wiki page for Programming Languages lists one for AutoHotkey and two for AutoHotkey v2 That's unfortunate. v2 should not be listed there. Rosetta Code has pages for implementations , and pages for languages . All versions of AHK are part of the same language . Different versions should ...

It sounds like you are having the same issue as burque505 mentioned in this thread . The underlying cause of the issue was not found in the other thread. You came to the same solution of using AccessibleObjectFromWindow as a workaround. Why it works is beyond my coding knowledge. They use different ...

My first guess is that Outlook is running as admin. If Outlook is running as admin then the script would need to be admin also. It's better if both are not running as admin. ComObjActive needs Outlook to be running. If it's not running then use ComObjCreate instead. If you just launched Outlook, yo...

I have not seen any posts there for v2 yet. The AutoHotkey 1.1 page still says that it's the current version. It hasn't been updated. Posts should be using the Works with template to identify the version. For example, link . Unfortunately, this only happens the minority of the time. Even with v1.1 v...

COM won't work in the new Outlook. Good news is that, from what I can tell, new Outlook will not replace Outlook. It's similar to other email programs in the past and present; like if you remember Outlook Express. This is a quote from the best summary I've seen: [New Outlook] is not a successor, but...

Realized since I am removing attachments I need to loop through them backwards to not mess up the index. I just realized I made the exact same mistake, even after I had read FanaticGuru's post. I corrected my script above. Specifically, this part: ; Remove files that are not PDF from the new mail i...

Here's one way to do it by looping through the sheets. You don't need the arrays though, I just used them to organize it a bit. You could replace the array with if-statements or switch. if (sht.Name = x) ... ... tabs := { 123: ["The General Building", 0xFF901E] , 456: ["Another Building", 0x00FFFF] ...