Re: [Request]: Official Library & Wrapper
Posted: 14 Sep 2018, 11:11
a is not an option.
Let's help each other out
https://www.autohotkey.com/boards/
https://www.autohotkey.com/boards/viewtopic.php?f=13&t=55617
Code: Select all
[
{
"Author": "Author",
"Thread URL": "Thread URL",
"GitHub Zip": " GitHub Zip"
},
{
"Author": "Author",
"Thread URL": "Thread URL",
"GitHub Zip": " GitHub Zip"
}
]
Yes, but I prefer actual code collection rather than just a 'bookmark'.guest3456 wrote:that's exactly what the awesome-authotkey list is:
https://github.com/ahkscript/awesome-AutoHotkey
What will happen if the author is not active anymore, the Pull Requests won't get reviewed or even merged.guest3456 wrote:unless of course youre expecting all the actual CODE of the libraries to all be in one place. but that is just absurd. each library should be in its own repo so that issues and bugs can be contained and maintained by the individual authors.
Yes elmo is correct, what I'm talking about is the actual code itself, not just a link to webpage or somewhere else.elmo wrote:@tomoe_uehara seems to be talking about (b) and, in the examples from other major platforms cited by @iseahound, they return code.
Unfortunately I think blindly uploading codes to the repository will make it bloated and the filesize will be very large to download, thus it will defeat the purpose of making a compact library itself.tank wrote:Do at least this and i will set a cron job ... to pull these packages to the server daily
Code: Select all
AHK LIB root folder/
|-- Algorithms/
| |-- algo_code.ahk
| +-- Example/
| |-- algo_example.ahk
| |-- another.file
| +-- image.jpg
|
|-- Parser/
| |-- JSON/
| | |-- json_parser.ahk
| | +-- Example/
| | +-- json_example.ahk
| +-- YAML/
| |-- yaml_parser.ahk
| +-- Example/
| +-- yaml_example.ahk
|
+-- ETC/
Agreed.kczx3 wrote:I don't think I'd want to be forced to download everything each time I want to get something new or update an existing library dependency.
Thats great to hear - I always thought the same as the others. Seems we misunderstood you.lexikos wrote:If the download or update of the "standard Lib" can be easily automated and "the community" wants it included with the installer, that is fine with me. I just want no part in maintaining it.