Page 1 of 1
lexikosisms
Posted: 14 Mar 2015, 01:42
by jethrow
Can't resist,
this may be the funniest reply I've read from lexikos:
lexikos wrote:As implied by omission from my previous post, I do not plan to implement it ...
... gotta love the level of directness
Note: I'm not bashing Coco in the least ... I thought it was a pretty legit question at first ...
Re: lexikosisms
Posted: 14 Mar 2015, 02:03
by Coco
Lol. Yeah, I had my doubts that he had decided not to implement it but I thought I'd give it a try. Had he not mentioned it in the post I linked, I probably wouldn't have proceeded.
Re: lexikosisms
Posted: 14 Mar 2015, 12:33
by joedf
lexikosisms...
Re: lexikosisms
Posted: 16 Mar 2015, 00:06
by guest3456
lol yes this guy is quite the character sometimes
Re: lexikosisms
Posted: 31 Mar 2015, 11:01
by fischgeek
I was reading through a few posts we had back and forth about some GUI changes and (taken out of context) in that was this line:
lexicos wrote:so perhaps I'll do what I normally do in such cases: nothing.
Re: lexikosisms
Posted: 31 Mar 2015, 11:18
by joedf
Also, to say nothing in a topic specifically about him lol
Re: lexikosisms
Posted: 31 Mar 2015, 11:46
by fischgeek
haha. yeah. We did this for tank once. I remember everyone had a quote of his in their signature. I was something like: Unfortunately, COM for Dummies is a lot like Brain Surgery for Dummies. In the end, you're just going to have to learn it
Re: lexikosisms
Posted: 31 Mar 2015, 15:13
by joedf
Lol XD yep haha
Re: lexikosisms
Posted: 06 Apr 2015, 10:57
by Relayer
Just ran into one that made me chuckle:
"v1.1.19.03 can't run broken scripts any more than other versions."
This was in response to someone suggesting a newer version will solve a problem they have.
Relayer
Re: lexikosisms
Posted: 06 Apr 2015, 11:02
by tank
fischgeek wrote:haha. yeah. We did this for tank once. I remember everyone had a quote of his in their signature. I was something like: Unfortunately, COM for Dummies is a lot like Brain Surgery for Dummies. In the end, you're just going to have to learn it
Ah i did love that one
Re: lexikosisms
Posted: 06 Apr 2015, 11:08
by tank
Re: lexikosisms
Posted: 06 Apr 2015, 11:38
by fischgeek
Hahaha!
Of course; if it was inevitable, there would be little point in Lexikos' previous argument.
Re: lexikosisms
Posted: 06 Apr 2015, 19:57
by joedf
regex selector hehe
/lexi[kc]osisms/g