remove all commands

[amnesiac]

I have read through the v2-thoughts. v2 sounds like it is just a transition vesion now.
Why not remove all commands to get better consistency (use functions, built-in var or object to replace it)?

[fincs]

In fact, 'commands' and 'functions' are planned to become the same thing in the final version of AHKv2, according to lexikos. Currently ex-commands can be called with function syntax and viceversa.

[amnesiac]

In fact, 'commands' and 'functions' are planned to become the same thing in the final version of AHKv2, according to lexikos. Currently ex-commands can be called with function syntax and viceversa.

Thanks for your explanation. What I worry about is that if I move to v2 now, it may be a great trouble when v2 may break the compatibility some day.

[lexikos]

StdLib: Yes to everything.

There are two mutually-exclusive possibilities presented under the Standard Library heading. You can't have everything.

Replace default base object with Value, String, Integer, Float and Object classes.

What is your view on reserving these names for this purpose? I am against it.

What I worry about is that if I move to v2 now, it may be a great trouble when v2 may break the compatibility some day.

I don't think that's relevant to this thread, but anyway,

As the feature set, behaviour and syntax aren't yet set in stone, [v2] is not recommended for general use.

[amnesiac]

What I worry about is that if I move to v2 now, it may be a great trouble when v2 may break the compatibility some day.

I don't think that's relevant to this thread, but anyway,

Sorry for that. Maybe I should post it to the Wish List? Please feel free to move it (and this maybe) to the appropriate place.

I don't think that's relevant to this thread, but anyway,

As the feature set, behaviour and syntax aren't yet set in stone, [v2] is not recommended for general use.

Thank you. I would move to v2 after its syntax is stable.