Keysharp - the resurrection of IronAHK

[BoBo]

[LKD]

Might we expect some source code anytime soon? The progress you have made is outstanding, but I'm sure it will be all the better with more eyes on the code. Not to mention some basic documentation can start being drafted from this.

[burque505]

Keysharp for Christmas?

[mfeemster]

No chance of anything by Christmas. I realize my initial projection was far too optimistic. Not just in terms of the functions to implement, but in the fundamental parsing of the language. It's likely I won't have anything to show by at least summer 2021.

For example, there was no ability to parse try/catch statements, but I have now added that.

There is still no ability to parse classes, and adding those will be a major effort. I am unsure if I can even do it, because language parsing is not really an area I know much about.

The manner in which object methods are called, is totally flawed. So statements like obj.Method() will only work sometimes.

FWIW, I finished the sound functions that I mentioned in my last post. I had to import code from a project called NAudio to do it.

I also made an icon several months ago, and have made it my avatar. This will be the official icon for the project.

I wish I had better news, but that's all I've got for now. Substantial further progress on the project will hinge entirely on my ability to fundamentally change how the parser works. I am not optimistic about that since it's beyond my ability. I may have to pull back and start from scratch on learning language parsing.

[burque505]

@mfeemster, that's still great news. Thanks again for all your effort, looking forward to seeing it.
Regards,
burque505

[mfeemster]

I appear to have fixed and unit tested the problems I mentioned previously with calling methods of built in classes, such as Array and Map. I am tentatively cautiously optimistic that the design of my fix will hold.

I am now going to attempt to implement the GUI functions. This effort will be huge because there are many such functions with very specific behavior. IronAHK has already started them, but the manner in which they designed it is a bit different than how I am going to do it. For that reason, this portion of the project will take quite a bit of effort and time. So forgive me if I don't report back for a while.

Also of note: I am on the AHK Discord under this same name, so feel free to chat me there if you want to talk about Keysharp.

[SOTE]

Thanks for the updates and your efforts.

[LKD70]

Thanks for the update on progress. If you need any help, posting the source code would allow me, and likely others to see what is holding off progress and possibly make pull requests which may assist.

[Chunjee]

Can't wait. Great job, keep going.

[Chunjee]

ahk (v1) has a noticeable lack of anonymous functions.

It is my request that they be supported in Keysharp.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anonymous_function

[mfeemster]

Thanks @Chunjee , anonymous functions would be useful, but would also be pretty hard to do. I'll have to put it way at the back of the queue.

I've made some decent progress on the GUI functions, but have a ways to go. Took off a week or so to work on some other things, but will get back on it soon.

BTW, I don't see you in the discord anymore. Are you still there?

[Chunjee]

BTW, I don't see you in the discord anymore. Are you still there?

I was on vacation for two weeks for wrist stress and didn't touch a computer much. If you @ mention me or send a direct message; eventually I'll see it.

[anaglypta]

I mentioned in a previous post, the AHK backport lib, there's also a GUI backport lib that may give you clues for shaping AHK v1 GUI commands into AHK v2 functions.

[BoBo]

Just stumbled over this a second ago. Probably usefull for someone out there (well, it's free so what? ): https://riptutorial.com/Download/csharp-language.pdf

[mfeemster]

Thanks @BoBo , I've been writing C# professionally since 2006, so I'm good to go there. But that document would definitely be useful for people wanting to learn it.

As for this project, I took a hiatus for a few months because I got busy with other things. I now have a lot more free time, so I am getting back on the GUI work.

I am currently working through the many different options that can be passed to the Show() and Add() methods for creating GUI controls. This is a very large portion of the project, so it'll be a while before I report any progress.

[HBinswanger]

I've been an AHK user for over a decade, and I have about 1500 lines of active AHK code, but I very ignorant compared to you guys. I don't know any OOP, for instance. Never even tried C or any of its variants. Hence my question: would it be possible to release now "Keysharp Lite," which would not have any OOP, GUI, and the other advanced capabilities? The thing in AHK that makes it indispensable for me is having macros for various shifted states of keys. For instance, to have cursor keys controlled by my assignments, so I don't have to move my hand from the "home keys" to get to the arrow keys.

And I do need the #ifWinActive feature, or some equivalent.

If I could do in Linux the kind of keystrokes I've habituated, I would be one happy camper, and wouldn't mind waiting many months for more advanced things (which I do sometimes use).

And a question: does Keysharp working in Linux implying working (perhaps not 100%) on Macs?

TIA.