Starting with digits in property names is unlocked but still undocumented or document is wrong Topic is solved

Share your ideas as to how the documentation can be improved.
User avatar
V2User
Posts: 195
Joined: 30 Apr 2021, 04:04

Starting with digits in property names is unlocked but still undocumented or document is wrong

02 Aug 2023, 07:22

I don't know at which moment this feature has been unlocked. Starting with digits in property names can already be allowed. However, the "feature" still remains undocumented, even though features like keyword names in property naming have already been documented in recent versions.
image.png
image.png (423.06 KiB) Viewed 1348 times
From what we can see, what the document described is not exactly correct and against the fact. As we can already use something like obj1.1:=xx freely.
Is it by design? though it has not been documented yet.
lexikos
Posts: 9665
Joined: 30 Sep 2013, 04:07
Contact:

Re: Starting with digits in property names is unlocked but still undocumented or document is wrong

05 Aug 2023, 19:57

Do not confuse "you can't do this" with a guarantee that the program will prevent you from doing it. Comparing the documentation to the behaviour and finding that they do not match is insufficient to prove which one of the two is incorrect.

But yes, names of properties are permitted to start with a digit, by design.
User avatar
Ragnar
Posts: 627
Joined: 30 Sep 2013, 15:25

Re: Starting with digits in property names is unlocked but still undocumented or document is wrong  Topic is solved

15 Aug 2023, 08:25

Thanks for reporting. I've changed it. The change is currently not visible due to the "under attack" mode.

Return to “Suggestions on Documentation Improvements”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest