I don't know at which moment this feature has been unlocked. Starting with digits in property names can already be allowed. However, the "feature" still remains undocumented, even though features like keyword names in property naming have already been documented in recent versions.
obj1.1:=xx freely.
Is it by design? though it has not been documented yet.
From what we can see, what the document described is not exactly correct and against the fact. As we can already use something like Starting with digits in property names is unlocked but still undocumented or document is wrong Topic is solved
Re: Starting with digits in property names is unlocked but still undocumented or document is wrong
Do not confuse "you can't do this" with a guarantee that the program will prevent you from doing it. Comparing the documentation to the behaviour and finding that they do not match is insufficient to prove which one of the two is incorrect.
But yes, names of properties are permitted to start with a digit, by design.
But yes, names of properties are permitted to start with a digit, by design.
Re: Starting with digits in property names is unlocked but still undocumented or document is wrong Topic is solved
Thanks for reporting. I've changed it. The change is currently not visible due to the "under attack" mode.